Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33001 - 33010 of 70090 for hi.
Search results 33001 - 33010 of 70090 for hi.
State v. Richard O. Mattingly
, 1998. used a peremptory strike to remove the juror from the petit panel thereby denying Mattingly his
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13570 - 2005-03-31
, 1998. used a peremptory strike to remove the juror from the petit panel thereby denying Mattingly his
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13570 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert L. Taylor
but his license was revoked in 1987 and has not been reinstated. The Office of Lawyer Regulation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16770 - 2017-09-21
but his license was revoked in 1987 and has not been reinstated. The Office of Lawyer Regulation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16770 - 2017-09-21
State v. Alfred Sharpe
from an order denying his motion for sentence credit. The issue is whether equal protection compels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7716 - 2005-03-31
from an order denying his motion for sentence credit. The issue is whether equal protection compels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7716 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Monsour
2 WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a). The sole issue on appeal is whether the taking of his blood sample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15980 - 2017-09-21
2 WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a). The sole issue on appeal is whether the taking of his blood sample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15980 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael L. Monsour
issue on appeal is whether the taking of his blood sample without a warrant violated the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15980 - 2005-03-31
issue on appeal is whether the taking of his blood sample without a warrant violated the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15980 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91338 - 2013-01-03
of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91338 - 2013-01-03
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Murphy
)(a) and (2) and 939.05, STATS., entered on his guilty plea, and from the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8574 - 2017-09-19
)(a) and (2) and 939.05, STATS., entered on his guilty plea, and from the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8574 - 2017-09-19
State v. David P. Baker
his encounter with Baker. The victim told the employer that a man had exposed himself to him
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14054 - 2005-03-31
his encounter with Baker. The victim told the employer that a man had exposed himself to him
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14054 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael R. Zunker
denying his motion for resentencing. He argues that he is entitled to resentencing before a different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15990 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion for resentencing. He argues that he is entitled to resentencing before a different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15990 - 2005-03-31
State v. John E. Lowther III
an enhanced penalty under § 939.62, Stats., and from a postconviction order denying his motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10984 - 2008-12-22
an enhanced penalty under § 939.62, Stats., and from a postconviction order denying his motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10984 - 2008-12-22