Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33001 - 33010 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 33001 - 33010 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
Larry Swanson v. School District of Butternut
of the School District of Butternut. Swanson argues that the agreement is ambiguous and that his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12556 - 2017-09-21
of the School District of Butternut. Swanson argues that the agreement is ambiguous and that his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12556 - 2017-09-21
State v. Carl Mitchell
a concurrent prison sentence. In his response to the no merit report, Mitchell claimed that he had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9744 - 2005-03-31
a concurrent prison sentence. In his response to the no merit report, Mitchell claimed that he had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9744 - 2005-03-31
State v. David S. Frederick
conclude that, as a matter of judicial efficiency, it is more expedient to address Frederick’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11535 - 2005-03-31
conclude that, as a matter of judicial efficiency, it is more expedient to address Frederick’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11535 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Rice
of the letter before the March 22 hearing. We reject Rice's claim that he was not afforded due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9120 - 2017-09-19
of the letter before the March 22 hearing. We reject Rice's claim that he was not afforded due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9120 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gary R. Malkmus
consecutive sentences. There is no evidence to support Malkmus’s claim that he deserves sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26332 - 2006-09-05
consecutive sentences. There is no evidence to support Malkmus’s claim that he deserves sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26332 - 2006-09-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
whether he had a sufficient reason for not bringing his current claims earlier. However, the brief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063139 - 2026-01-15
whether he had a sufficient reason for not bringing his current claims earlier. However, the brief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063139 - 2026-01-15
State v. Douglas K. Uhde
accepted the case, the State submitted a brief reversing its position on Uhde’s burglary misstatement claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5918 - 2005-03-31
accepted the case, the State submitted a brief reversing its position on Uhde’s burglary misstatement claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5918 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gerald Heckathorn
to search his apartment for contraband. As Heckathorn acknowledges, his ineffectiveness claim depends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17824 - 2005-05-02
to search his apartment for contraband. As Heckathorn acknowledges, his ineffectiveness claim depends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17824 - 2005-05-02
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Steve Watters
Weissenberger’s petition to determine whether he has stated a claim under the open records law. See §§ 19.35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11636 - 2005-03-31
Weissenberger’s petition to determine whether he has stated a claim under the open records law. See §§ 19.35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11636 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Medina argued he was prejudiced by trial counsel’s deficient performance. To establish a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612397 - 2023-01-25
. Medina argued he was prejudiced by trial counsel’s deficient performance. To establish a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612397 - 2023-01-25