Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33021 - 33030 of 39849 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 33021 - 33030 of 39849 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Robert E. Christophel
but conclusory statements. This is not enough. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 316, 548 N.W.2d 50, 56
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4156 - 2005-03-31
but conclusory statements. This is not enough. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 316, 548 N.W.2d 50, 56
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4156 - 2005-03-31
State v. Reinaldo C. Acosta
hypothesis bolstered by a statement of fact sufficient to justify the conclusion or inference the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19911 - 2005-10-10
hypothesis bolstered by a statement of fact sufficient to justify the conclusion or inference the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19911 - 2005-10-10
Frontsheet
Tishberg filed a written statement in which he conceded his misconduct but argued that a reprimand
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125367 - 2014-10-27
Tishberg filed a written statement in which he conceded his misconduct but argued that a reprimand
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125367 - 2014-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
. Garrett did not contest these statements. The court withheld sentence and placed Garrett on probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90706 - 2012-12-18
. Garrett did not contest these statements. The court withheld sentence and placed Garrett on probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90706 - 2012-12-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) the No. 2018AP1848 4 State breached WIS. STAT. § 971.23 by inadequately summarizing certain statements used
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250416 - 2019-11-18
) the No. 2018AP1848 4 State breached WIS. STAT. § 971.23 by inadequately summarizing certain statements used
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250416 - 2019-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
this opinion based on Quinn’s statements to her that he only takes his medication when he remembers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63153 - 2011-04-25
this opinion based on Quinn’s statements to her that he only takes his medication when he remembers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63153 - 2011-04-25
COURT OF APPEALS
affidavit, he claimed that his then-attorney told him, contrary to the statements contained in the guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97429 - 2013-05-30
affidavit, he claimed that his then-attorney told him, contrary to the statements contained in the guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97429 - 2013-05-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective for failing to: move to suppress the statements that he made to police; move to suppress his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989780 - 2025-07-29
was ineffective for failing to: move to suppress the statements that he made to police; move to suppress his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989780 - 2025-07-29
CA Blank Order
counsel was ineffective because counsel failed to object to Mason’s false statements to the presentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115394 - 2014-07-01
counsel was ineffective because counsel failed to object to Mason’s false statements to the presentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115394 - 2014-07-01
[PDF]
State v. Romel D.
was entitled to believe Romel D.’s statement that he possessed illegal drugs. Thus, the officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15775 - 2017-09-21
was entitled to believe Romel D.’s statement that he possessed illegal drugs. Thus, the officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15775 - 2017-09-21