Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33021 - 33030 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 33021 - 33030 of 64042 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the motion are insufficient or conclusory, or if the record irrefutably demonstrates that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32080 - 2008-03-12
of the motion are insufficient or conclusory, or if the record irrefutably demonstrates that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32080 - 2008-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
-revocation record does not reflect the sentencing judge’s awareness of the information in the presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36732 - 2009-06-08
-revocation record does not reflect the sentencing judge’s awareness of the information in the presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36732 - 2009-06-08
State v. Abdullah Refeeq Beyah
). The only evidence in the record supporting coercive conduct by the police is Beyah's testimony. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10431 - 2005-03-31
). The only evidence in the record supporting coercive conduct by the police is Beyah's testimony. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10431 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marlo U. Morales
to allege sufficient facts in the motion, presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19876 - 2005-10-10
to allege sufficient facts in the motion, presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19876 - 2005-10-10
[PDF]
State v. Rudy A. Gerardo
on the day scheduled for jury trial in this case. The record indicates that after the jury selection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13508 - 2017-09-21
on the day scheduled for jury trial in this case. The record indicates that after the jury selection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13508 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael T. Schmaling
the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record. No. 94-3041-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8281 - 2017-09-19
the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record. No. 94-3041-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8281 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assumption, [and] did nothing more than subpoena records to discover relevant information on behalf of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152778 - 2017-09-21
assumption, [and] did nothing more than subpoena records to discover relevant information on behalf of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152778 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
must be determined solely from the record of the sentencing hearing. See State v. Grady, 2007 WI 125
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36522 - 2014-09-15
must be determined solely from the record of the sentencing hearing. See State v. Grady, 2007 WI 125
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36522 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
and the sentences,” and incredible. There is evidence in the record to support this finding. In addition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12447 - 2017-09-21
and the sentences,” and incredible. There is evidence in the record to support this finding. In addition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12447 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
charge both counts. The record belies this claim. The record demonstrates both that Gallion knew one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29207 - 2014-09-15
charge both counts. The record belies this claim. The record demonstrates both that Gallion knew one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29207 - 2014-09-15