Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33031 - 33040 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33031 - 33040 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with a motion for the modification of child support and maintenance awards and a motion to reopen the divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94924 - 2014-09-15
with a motion for the modification of child support and maintenance awards and a motion to reopen the divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94924 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
genitals to a child. He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. Garrett argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526399 - 2022-06-01
genitals to a child. He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. Garrett argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526399 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with no quarterly payments. ¶5 In May 2019, Jan filed a motion to modify maintenance, alleging that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467863 - 2021-12-28
with no quarterly payments. ¶5 In May 2019, Jan filed a motion to modify maintenance, alleging that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467863 - 2021-12-28
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Helm
, JJ. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, P.J. Timothy J. Helm appeals pro se from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4361 - 2017-09-19
, JJ. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, P.J. Timothy J. Helm appeals pro se from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4361 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Diane Antczak v. River Hills South Investors
”), and from the trial court order No. 97-1857 2 granting River Hills’s motion for sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12682 - 2017-09-21
”), and from the trial court order No. 97-1857 2 granting River Hills’s motion for sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12682 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with a motion for the modification of child support and maintenance awards and a motion to reopen the divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94513 - 2014-09-15
with a motion for the modification of child support and maintenance awards and a motion to reopen the divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94513 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey S. Gill
motion to suppress evidence. We find no error and affirm. FACTS ¶2 On December 31, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17950 - 2017-09-21
motion to suppress evidence. We find no error and affirm. FACTS ¶2 On December 31, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17950 - 2017-09-21
Phillip G. Epping v. City of Neillsville Common Council
performance. The common council then reconvened in open session, and a motion was made to terminate Epping’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12067 - 2005-03-31
performance. The common council then reconvened in open session, and a motion was made to terminate Epping’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12067 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James E. Gray
, his postconviction motion for relief. Gray claims that the trial court: (1) erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11741 - 2014-09-15
, his postconviction motion for relief. Gray claims that the trial court: (1) erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11741 - 2014-09-15
Susan I. Olson v. Stapleton Corporation
discretion by failing to grant appellants’ motion to adjourn; (4) erred in failing to grant appellants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10186 - 2005-03-31
discretion by failing to grant appellants’ motion to adjourn; (4) erred in failing to grant appellants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10186 - 2005-03-31