Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33031 - 33040 of 58285 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Thomas Dubak
argues that the State presented insufficient evidence to support his convictions and that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15105 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Francis J. Bradac v. Board of Review of Town of Farmington
demonstrates that the assessments were not uniform. The board upheld the assessment. The trial court upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9047 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Gregory J. Kasubaski v. Maureen Desmond Kasubaski
(11), STATS.,1 was not satisfied. The trial court concluded that Maureen had not waived her rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8760 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Lance Reyzer v. Marten Transport, Ltd.
Transport’s and Kehoe’s negligence was not a cause of Reyzer’s spinal injuries. The trial court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13432 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jason P. Sypher
the trial court’s denial of Sypher’s motion to suppress the Intoxilyzer test results, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16213 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
to trial. After trial, the court dismissed that counterclaim. Lane now appeals and raises issues about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102788 - 2013-10-09

Gregory J. Kasubaski v. Maureen Desmond Kasubaski
of § 801.05(11), Stats.,[1] was not satisfied. The trial court concluded that Maureen had not waived her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8760 - 2005-03-31

Allstate Insurance Company v. Volkswagen of America
of the Dietrich’s Volkswagen automobile, and this interlocutory appeal also concerns the trial court’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6903 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert C. Wagnon
appeals. ¶3 Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and a strong policy exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6998 - 2017-09-20

State v. Kirk Ennenga
that the sentencing judge had any personal interest in the matter, and affirm the order of the trial court. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15011 - 2005-03-31