Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33041 - 33050 of 63537 for records.

Rock County Department of Human Services v. Janella R.
and the facts of record. Tara P., 252 Wis. 2d 179, ¶6. “[E]xpert testimony is admissible in Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6953 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the 3 The record reflects that Murphy had not yet returned Fernandez’s photo identification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72163 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Clayton Ganser v. Claudia Schwartz
is hereby acknowledged.” The option was in recordable form, bearing Schwartz’s notarized signature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12757 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] David Miswald v. Waukesha County Board of Adjustment
that this is so. The actual 1986 variance proceedings are not part of the record. Instead, this event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9203 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
by waiving Kerr’s speedy trial demand. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189805 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 3, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
there is no affidavit in the record (either pretrial or postconviction) identifying with any specificity the details
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120946 - 2014-09-02

Rock County Department of Human Services v. Janella R.
and the facts of record. Tara P., 252 Wis. 2d 179, ¶6. “[E]xpert testimony is admissible in Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6947 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. David R.W.
of whether the prior false allegation … was admissible.” After determining that “the facts from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10758 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and analyze Young and M.Y.’s cell phone records for the dates of the offense; (4) obtain an expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307053 - 2020-11-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2021AP85-CR 5 ¶11 Here, the record does not reflect that Crawford was prejudiced by the amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540382 - 2022-07-06