Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33041 - 33050 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 33041 - 33050 of 58458 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Eric C. Hilson
of his arrest. The trial court noted that it would have excluded the testimony had an objection been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4194 - 2017-09-19
of his arrest. The trial court noted that it would have excluded the testimony had an objection been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4194 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James Munroe v. Gary R. McCaughtry
, the defendants moved for summary judgment. The trial court denied Munroe’s motion and did not act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10557 - 2017-09-20
, the defendants moved for summary judgment. The trial court denied Munroe’s motion and did not act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10557 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on October 29, 2020 and ended the following day. The matter proceeded to a jury trial where the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728336 - 2023-11-21
on October 29, 2020 and ended the following day. The matter proceeded to a jury trial where the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728336 - 2023-11-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
; or the effectiveness of trial counsel’s representation. Warminski was provided a copy of the report, but has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883780 - 2024-12-05
; or the effectiveness of trial counsel’s representation. Warminski was provided a copy of the report, but has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883780 - 2024-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS
appeal, he claimed that his trial counsel was ineffective by: (1) failing to object to the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36480 - 2009-05-18
appeal, he claimed that his trial counsel was ineffective by: (1) failing to object to the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36480 - 2009-05-18
COURT OF APPEALS
. He claims that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel and that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30675 - 2007-10-22
. He claims that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel and that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30675 - 2007-10-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[e]ither party may file a demand for trial within 10 days from the date of an oral decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190821 - 2017-09-21
that “[e]ither party may file a demand for trial within 10 days from the date of an oral decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190821 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 974.06 motion alleging multiple instances of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. McGinnis also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817814 - 2024-06-25
. § 974.06 motion alleging multiple instances of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. McGinnis also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817814 - 2024-06-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, Schick argues that trial counsel misled him, and that he should be allowed to withdraw
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261396 - 2020-05-21
to the no-merit report, Schick argues that trial counsel misled him, and that he should be allowed to withdraw
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261396 - 2020-05-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul W. Schnelz
claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because no probable cause existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11214 - 2017-09-19
claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because no probable cause existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11214 - 2017-09-19