Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33051 - 33060 of 83513 for case code.
Search results 33051 - 33060 of 83513 for case code.
State v. Torrey Y.
in damage under the facts of this case. We disagree. We affirm the restitution order. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14836 - 2005-03-31
in damage under the facts of this case. We disagree. We affirm the restitution order. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14836 - 2005-03-31
Sheboygan County Department of Human Services v. Dawn R.
in this case failed to allege and contain information giving rise to a reasonable inference sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5957 - 2005-03-31
in this case failed to allege and contain information giving rise to a reasonable inference sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5957 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the State rested its case, Nelson thrice confirmed her desire to testify on her own behalf. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101620 - 2013-09-03
the State rested its case, Nelson thrice confirmed her desire to testify on her own behalf. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101620 - 2013-09-03
[PDF]
Robert Owens, Jr. v. Shoreline Real Estate Co., Inc.
case. Owens was a tenant at 1104 North Marshall Street, #604, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, for three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7088 - 2017-09-20
case. Owens was a tenant at 1104 North Marshall Street, #604, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, for three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7088 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109618 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109618 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160642 - 2017-09-21
and the record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160642 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the parties’ affidavits and other submissions to determine whether the movant has made a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82287 - 2012-05-09
the parties’ affidavits and other submissions to determine whether the movant has made a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82287 - 2012-05-09
Alvar Larson v. City of Elkhorn
be considered. The court further held that the Board in that case would have been acting contrary to law had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2326 - 2005-03-31
be considered. The court further held that the Board in that case would have been acting contrary to law had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2326 - 2005-03-31
Edwin C. West v. Byran Bartow
2002 WI App 42 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-0962 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3821 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 42 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-0962 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3821 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kendrick C. East III
a postconviction motion on October 29, 2002, claiming that the case should be dismissed for noncompliance with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6365 - 2005-03-31
a postconviction motion on October 29, 2002, claiming that the case should be dismissed for noncompliance with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6365 - 2005-03-31