Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33061 - 33070 of 37898 for d's.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 11, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appe...
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JONATHAN D. WATTS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108943 - 2014-03-10

[PDF] Iowa County Department of Human Services v. Mary M.K.
court for Iowa County: WILLIAM D. DYKE, Judge. Affirmed. No. 00-0161 2 ¶1 ROGGENSACK
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2164 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Walter Smith
on the facts of the record, and in accordance with accepted legal principles. D. The court of appeals can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14083 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Terry L. Benn v. James H. Benn
of the petitioner-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of John A. Baxter and Eric D. Reinicke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14631 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
in the trial court relating to Dyble’s examination. ¶20 Counsel did in fact ask Dyble: “[D]id Katie [F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36376 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(4g)(d)2. WISCONSIN STAT. § 767.407 provides, in relevant part, that a court “shall appoint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238823 - 2019-04-09

State v. Barry A. Vann
and impulsive behavior, “there [was] no clear and convincing evidence that identifie[d] his childhood problems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18739 - 2005-06-27

Thomas J. Pionke v. Town of Dayton
at $148,778, (c) ordering a reassessment of the entire town, (d) finding a uniformity clause violation, and (e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13972 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
from ordinary repairs.” Id., ¶17 (quoting Kallas Millwork Corp. v. Square D Co., 66 Wis. 2d 382, 386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146338 - 2015-08-18

State v. Luther Wade Cofield
, the court concluded that “[i]t constitute[d] a subjective evaluation of the status of [the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5877 - 2005-03-31