Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33071 - 33080 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33071 - 33080 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
CA Blank Order
, appeals an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief. Gravelle was convicted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100004 - 2013-07-29
, appeals an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief. Gravelle was convicted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100004 - 2013-07-29
[PDF]
Mark A. Flood v. Robert A. Benkoski
court that denied his motion for summary judgment and granted plaintiff Mark A. Flood’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16085 - 2017-09-21
court that denied his motion for summary judgment and granted plaintiff Mark A. Flood’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16085 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that there is no arguable merit to any issue Baewer could raise in a motion to withdraw his pleas, we reject the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206497 - 2017-12-29
that there is no arguable merit to any issue Baewer could raise in a motion to withdraw his pleas, we reject the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206497 - 2017-12-29
[PDF]
-OA; added decisions in 2021AP311-CR and 2021AP1399-CR; added oral argument dates for November
Quintell McBride When reviewing a motion to suppress, what is the proper application of the “clearly
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727982 - 2023-11-09
Quintell McBride When reviewing a motion to suppress, what is the proper application of the “clearly
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727982 - 2023-11-09
[PDF]
State v. Bruce W. Ackerman
testimony. However, contradictory evidence was given at the postconviction motion hearing concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2650 - 2017-09-19
testimony. However, contradictory evidence was given at the postconviction motion hearing concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2650 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 704.90(12) for the appeal, and she has filed a motion requesting fees. We deny the motion because she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58134 - 2014-09-15
. § 704.90(12) for the appeal, and she has filed a motion requesting fees. We deny the motion because she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58134 - 2014-09-15
State v. Bruce W. Ackerman
testimony. However, contradictory evidence was given at the postconviction motion hearing concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2650 - 2005-03-31
testimony. However, contradictory evidence was given at the postconviction motion hearing concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2650 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
M&I Bank South Central v. Neil C. Lofberg
, Inc. (Supervalu) appeals from a final order of the trial court denying its motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12752 - 2017-09-21
, Inc. (Supervalu) appeals from a final order of the trial court denying its motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12752 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to post-trial motions from the Marquezes, the court determined that they are not entitled to amend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70430 - 2011-08-31
to post-trial motions from the Marquezes, the court determined that they are not entitled to amend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70430 - 2011-08-31
[PDF]
Roger T. Lambert v. Yvonne Hein
’ amended complaint, (2) erroneously denied the Lamberts’ motion for summary judgment, and (3) erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12191 - 2017-09-21
’ amended complaint, (2) erroneously denied the Lamberts’ motion for summary judgment, and (3) erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12191 - 2017-09-21

