Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33071 - 33080 of 39838 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 33071 - 33080 of 39838 for financial disclosure statement.
COURT OF APPEALS
to his appeal, other than a conclusory statement that the exhibit “easily” could have proved that certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144517 - 2015-07-15
to his appeal, other than a conclusory statement that the exhibit “easily” could have proved that certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144517 - 2015-07-15
State v. Karla J.
instruction based on Karla’s false statements to the jury about her employment at a grocery store. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20645 - 2005-12-19
instruction based on Karla’s false statements to the jury about her employment at a grocery store. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20645 - 2005-12-19
State v. Joseph Bogdanske
from defense counsel and the court. Again, the jury heard during opening statements and closing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2324 - 2005-03-31
from defense counsel and the court. Again, the jury heard during opening statements and closing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2324 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was officer Lindeman’s statement that Ulwelling’s vehicle was between one to one and one-half car lengths
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125618 - 2014-11-03
was officer Lindeman’s statement that Ulwelling’s vehicle was between one to one and one-half car lengths
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125618 - 2014-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
of filing. Furthermore, Miller’s own statements show he was aware of the purpose of the hearing. Upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47472 - 2010-03-02
of filing. Furthermore, Miller’s own statements show he was aware of the purpose of the hearing. Upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47472 - 2010-03-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statement regarding prior offenses was an “inadvertent mistake” and unintentional. Accordingly, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167920 - 2017-09-21
statement regarding prior offenses was an “inadvertent mistake” and unintentional. Accordingly, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167920 - 2017-09-21
State v. William E. Hall
any signed statement of the defendant which might demonstrate that the defendant had notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2627 - 2005-03-31
any signed statement of the defendant which might demonstrate that the defendant had notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2627 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bentura Martinez
evidence regarding this issue is the victim's statement that the other three men in the photo array did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9312 - 2017-09-19
evidence regarding this issue is the victim's statement that the other three men in the photo array did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9312 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this interpretation, arguing that the second sentence of Pella’s answer does not negate the clear statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144452 - 2017-09-21
this interpretation, arguing that the second sentence of Pella’s answer does not negate the clear statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144452 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that these crimes had on the victims who had communicated with the court through victim impact statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159479 - 2017-09-21
that these crimes had on the victims who had communicated with the court through victim impact statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159479 - 2017-09-21