Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33071 - 33080 of 45854 for paternity test paper work.

State v. Joshua B.
beyond a reasonable doubt. The test is not whether this court or any of the members thereof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25985 - 2006-07-25

[PDF] CA Blank Order
; off-white powder; a phone; and a semi-automatic weapon. Testing determined that the bag held over
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=867171 - 2024-10-29

State v. Jesse J. Rabas
their personal reliability has not previously been proved or tested. See State v. Doyle, 96 Wis. 2d 272, 286-87
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2823 - 2005-03-31

State v. Arthur Foster
" not easily subjected to "any bright-line test." Id. at 275-76, 362 N.W.2d at 152-53. As stated by the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10019 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
Statutes are to the 2005-06 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2006AP2136-CR 3 blood test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28620 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of Grant v. Vogt, 2014 WI 76, ¶19, 356 Wis. 2d 343, 850 N.W.2d 253. The test for whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241637 - 2019-06-04

COURT OF APPEALS
to the officers or others; the test is not probable cause.” Id. A protective sweep may also be employed when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34862 - 2008-12-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
sobriety tests performed at the hospital, the officers concluded that French was under the influence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460347 - 2021-12-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel test. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 697 (1984) (“[T]here is no reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63723 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
an offense. “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66557 - 2014-09-15