Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33091 - 33100 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 33091 - 33100 of 63981 for records/1000.
State v. Roger M. Smejkal
has not shown that the trial court relied on its statement. See id., ¶22. In fact, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6600 - 2005-03-31
has not shown that the trial court relied on its statement. See id., ¶22. In fact, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6600 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the record for any credible evidence that supports the jury’s findings. See id. Additionally, West did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28690 - 2007-04-09
the record for any credible evidence that supports the jury’s findings. See id. Additionally, West did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28690 - 2007-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
345. On this record, the circuit court’s findings regarding “‘the circumstances of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217403 - 2018-08-15
345. On this record, the circuit court’s findings regarding “‘the circumstances of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217403 - 2018-08-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that he has the right to terminate them.[7] Thus, the record reveals that Rip Maclay, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35458 - 2009-02-04
that he has the right to terminate them.[7] Thus, the record reveals that Rip Maclay, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35458 - 2009-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s exercise of discretion, we examine the record to determine whether the court logically interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64800 - 2011-05-31
court’s exercise of discretion, we examine the record to determine whether the court logically interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64800 - 2011-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
has gathered the necessary information and court records to warrant a hearing.” ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101959 - 2013-09-16
has gathered the necessary information and court records to warrant a hearing.” ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101959 - 2013-09-16
State v. Howard C. Carter
demeanor demonstrated his impartiality is unsupported by the record. We could find no references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4338 - 2005-03-31
demeanor demonstrated his impartiality is unsupported by the record. We could find no references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4338 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). Rather, we must examine the record for any credible and substantial evidence that supports the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35129 - 2009-01-07
). Rather, we must examine the record for any credible and substantial evidence that supports the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35129 - 2009-01-07
[PDF]
Oshkosh ParaprofessionalEducation Association v. Oshkosh Area SchoolDistrict
on seniority, merit, work record, qualifications, and personal fitness. Where merit, work record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8513 - 2017-09-19
on seniority, merit, work record, qualifications, and personal fitness. Where merit, work record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8513 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report, but he did not file one. We have independently reviewed the record, the corrected no- merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307721 - 2020-12-01
report, but he did not file one. We have independently reviewed the record, the corrected no- merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307721 - 2020-12-01