Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3311 - 3320 of 59362 for do.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
discretion when it provides a “rational and explainable basis” for the sentence. Id., ¶39. In order to do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28217 - 2007-02-26

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
sentence in the absence of a request to do so. Because the risk reduction sentence statute has been
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92716 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Cleansoils Wisconsin, Inc.
in this case. The State argues that they do. ¶4 The doctrine of issue preclusion limits relitigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15559 - 2017-09-21

Susan H. H. by her guardian Western Wisconsin Guardian Services v. Brandon A. H.
period.[2] The court agreed to do so. The court noted, however, that it questioned Susan’s competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2728 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to be gained by readvertising it and doing this all again.” ¶8 In addition, the court noted practical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114327 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Robert Harris
laws in the event they both cover the same subject matter; they do not displace more restrictive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14385 - 2014-09-15

Glenn E. Tagatz v. Township of Crystal Lake
parcel if asked to do so. We conclude that the Town has discretion under § 80.13(3) to decide whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2506 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was “not adhered to.” We do not address undeveloped arguments and will not abandon our neutrality to develop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241537 - 2019-06-05

[PDF] Secura Insurance Company v. Jerry Brubaker
raised arguments concerning both the judgment and the order. Therefore, we do not address whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6087 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
neglected to analyze this issue as we were obliged to do in Sharp’s no-merit appeal pursuant to Anders, 386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30199 - 2007-09-10