Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3311 - 3320 of 76576 for judgment for u s.
Search results 3311 - 3320 of 76576 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
WI 71
: ATTORNEYS: For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Mark S. Young, Rhonda L. Lanford
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37443 - 2014-09-15
: ATTORNEYS: For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Mark S. Young, Rhonda L. Lanford
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37443 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Jefferson County: BENNETT J. BRANTMEIER, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263240 - 2020-06-04
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Jefferson County: BENNETT J. BRANTMEIER, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263240 - 2020-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
notes that “[u]nlike the photo array shown to [Oliver], with [Margaret] the [S]tate never introduced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448003 - 2021-11-02
notes that “[u]nlike the photo array shown to [Oliver], with [Margaret] the [S]tate never introduced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448003 - 2021-11-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
defendants. New Berlin moved for summary judgment, arguing inter alia that, as a government entity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197182 - 2017-10-04
defendants. New Berlin moved for summary judgment, arguing inter alia that, as a government entity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197182 - 2017-10-04
[PDF]
WI 7
the court would decide the summary judgment motion based on the U.S.’s filing alone. ¶47 On January 21
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923746 - 2025-04-11
the court would decide the summary judgment motion based on the U.S.’s filing alone. ¶47 On January 21
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923746 - 2025-04-11
Eau Claire County v. General Teamsters Union Local No. 662
, Defendant. REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, CHIEF
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17454 - 2005-03-31
, Defendant. REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, CHIEF
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17454 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Eau Claire County v. General Teamsters Union Local No. 662
. Affirmed. ¶1 SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, CHIEF JUSTICE. This is a review of a published decision
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17454 - 2017-09-21
. Affirmed. ¶1 SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, CHIEF JUSTICE. This is a review of a published decision
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17454 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: RICHARD G. NIESS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53874 - 2014-09-15
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: RICHARD G. NIESS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53874 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 147
upon a finding that Acuity has No. 2009AP1321 3 satisfied the Zarnstorffs’ judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55515 - 2014-09-15
upon a finding that Acuity has No. 2009AP1321 3 satisfied the Zarnstorffs’ judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55515 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: Richard G. NIESS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53874 - 2010-09-01
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: Richard G. NIESS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53874 - 2010-09-01