Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3311 - 3320 of 5877 for la.

[PDF] Wisconsin Circuit Court Access Oversight Committee Retention and Accuracy Subcommittee August 2005 minutes
; Police Chief Rick Myers, Appleton Police Department; Judge Dale Pasell, La Crosse County; A. John
/courts/committees/docs/retentionminutes0805.pdf - 2009-11-16

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - March 2006
that originated in the following counties: Dane Grant Kenosha La Crosse Marathon Polk Walworth Waukesha
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21775 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
argument. City of La Crosse concerned the sufficiency of notice that must be given to a town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257974 - 2020-04-16

[PDF] WI App 33
. Noack, the cause was submitted on the brief of Dean P. Laing and Patrick G. McBride of O’Neil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108163 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 134
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Catherine A. La Fleur of La Fleur Law Office, S.C. of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38860 - 2014-09-15

Wisconsin Department of Employment Relations v.
contract.” See La Crosse Prof’l Police Ass’n v. City of La Crosse, 212 Wis. 2d 90, 98, 568 N.W.2d 20 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5582 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Meriter Hospital, Inc. v. Dane County
, the remedy lies with the legislature, not the courts." La Crosse Hosp. v. La Crosse, 133 Wis. 2d 335, 338
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16681 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ralph E. Ruesch
-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of James L. Kroner, Jr. of Moen Sheehan Meyer, Ltd. of La
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11236 - 2017-09-19

State v. Ronald Keith
to produce the witness, in accordance with prior precedent such as La Barge v. State, 74 Wis.2d 327, 336, 246
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11268 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of Catherine A. La Fleur of La Fleur Law Office, S.C. of Milwaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38860 - 2009-09-28