Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3311 - 3320 of 6188 for sheriff.
Search results 3311 - 3320 of 6188 for sheriff.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at Martens’ refusal hearing of two Clark County sheriff’s deputies, one of whom arrested Martens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192830 - 2017-09-21
at Martens’ refusal hearing of two Clark County sheriff’s deputies, one of whom arrested Martens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192830 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
County Sheriff’s Deputy responded to a call from a citizen, Anton Kalcik, complaining that his neighbor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114677 - 2014-06-17
County Sheriff’s Deputy responded to a call from a citizen, Anton Kalcik, complaining that his neighbor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114677 - 2014-06-17
Carl Rucker v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.
of the record on appeal: (1) the sheriff’s department process report; and (2) a brochure published by John
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2861 - 2005-03-31
of the record on appeal: (1) the sheriff’s department process report; and (2) a brochure published by John
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2861 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark J. Tilot
, 2003, off-duty Brown County sheriff’s deputy Fred Heitl observed a woman in a dress and no shoes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19980 - 2005-10-17
, 2003, off-duty Brown County sheriff’s deputy Fred Heitl observed a woman in a dress and no shoes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19980 - 2005-10-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 19, 2013, at 4:57 p.m., Columbia County Sheriff’s Deputy Emily Morgan stopped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196001 - 2017-09-21
. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 19, 2013, at 4:57 p.m., Columbia County Sheriff’s Deputy Emily Morgan stopped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196001 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
suspicion supported his temporary detention. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Langlade County Sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141241 - 2017-09-21
suspicion supported his temporary detention. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Langlade County Sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141241 - 2017-09-21
State v. Singkeo Inphachack
was walking in an unusual manner at the scene, and after he was transported to the sheriff's department, crack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9362 - 2005-03-31
was walking in an unusual manner at the scene, and after he was transported to the sheriff's department, crack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9362 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, but still be under the watchful eye of the sheriff every night after you return from your job. I don’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27935 - 2014-09-15
, but still be under the watchful eye of the sheriff every night after you return from your job. I don’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27935 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
GMAC Mortgage Corporation of Pennsylvania v. Michael Gisvold
the successful bidders at the sheriff's sale to complete the purchase. The Gisvolds argue that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10943 - 2017-09-19
the successful bidders at the sheriff's sale to complete the purchase. The Gisvolds argue that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10943 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
and affirm. ¶2 A Kenosha sheriff’s deputy responded to a report of a vehicular accident on May 1, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31409 - 2014-09-15
and affirm. ¶2 A Kenosha sheriff’s deputy responded to a report of a vehicular accident on May 1, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31409 - 2014-09-15