Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3311 - 3320 of 23432 for tawnee stone 2001.

[PDF] Rules petition 02-03 supplemental memo
to procedures used by the Federal Court in considering Wisconsin redstricting in 2001. (Ammngton, et al., v
/supreme/docs/0203supplementalmemo.pdf - 2010-01-20

[PDF] Ruth Genke v. NDC, Inc.
, and Hondo subsequently joined in the motion. The trial court granted the motion on October 8, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5621 - 2017-09-19

Ruth Genke v. NDC, Inc.
, 2001, and entered an order for judgment on October 22, 2001. ¶5 On October 31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5621 - 2005-03-31

Larry L. George v. David H. Schwarz
2001 WI App 72 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3114 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James F. Brienzo
that the First Amendment barred the application of WIS. STAT. § 948.07 (2001-02), 1 the child enticement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3986 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Deutsches Land, Inc. v. City of Glendale
to a larger exemption for several parcels of its property for the 2001 tax year. On appeal, Deutsches Land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19038 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric K. Graf
Regulations' (OLR) subsequent efforts to investigate him. By order dated August 27, 2001, Attorney Graf
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16661 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Madison v. Jeffrey Crossfield
by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2001-02). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5951 - 2017-09-19

State v. Barry A. Kundert
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 19, 2001 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk, Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3442 - 2005-03-31

Deutsches Land, Inc. v. City of Glendale
property for the 2001 tax year. On appeal, Deutsches Land insists that: (1) by not ordering judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19038 - 2005-07-18