Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3311 - 3320 of 7645 for yes.
Search results 3311 - 3320 of 7645 for yes.
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence J. Gaston
? A. No. Q. You’re relying solely on the statement of [the victim]? A. Yes – and I believe that statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16284 - 2017-09-21
? A. No. Q. You’re relying solely on the statement of [the victim]? A. Yes – and I believe that statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16284 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James Zamitalo
an alternate test taken, is that correct? JENSEN: Yes. THE COURT: I will let you proceed. Zamitalo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10818 - 2017-09-20
an alternate test taken, is that correct? JENSEN: Yes. THE COURT: I will let you proceed. Zamitalo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10818 - 2017-09-20
State v. Jacob W. Hatcher
and that, yes, he had been drinking. ¶4 Fitzgerald asked Hatcher to exit the car and accompany him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5746 - 2013-09-25
and that, yes, he had been drinking. ¶4 Fitzgerald asked Hatcher to exit the car and accompany him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5746 - 2013-09-25
City of Berlin v. Jane M. Bartol
to a chemical test of her blood, and she said yes. Based upon this test result, Olson also cited Bartol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7185 - 2014-03-25
to a chemical test of her blood, and she said yes. Based upon this test result, Olson also cited Bartol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7185 - 2014-03-25
State v. Ruth M. Davis
.” The officer asked if she had been drinking and Davis answered yes, she had had three drinks at work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19140 - 2005-07-27
.” The officer asked if she had been drinking and Davis answered yes, she had had three drinks at work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19140 - 2005-07-27
[PDF]
State v. Matthew J. Knapp
? [Roets]: Yes, I did. [State]: And you knew that, in order to interview him effectively in custody
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19017 - 2017-09-21
? [Roets]: Yes, I did. [State]: And you knew that, in order to interview him effectively in custody
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19017 - 2017-09-21
Brown County v. Shannon R.
be yes. ¶13 The jury was instructed (in accordance with pattern instruction Wis JI-Children 324
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20457 - 2005-11-29
be yes. ¶13 The jury was instructed (in accordance with pattern instruction Wis JI-Children 324
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20457 - 2005-11-29
State v. Matthew J. Knapp
at the——in the office, I mean, you knew that he was in custody, right? [Roets]: Yes, I did. [State]: And you knew
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19017 - 2005-07-13
at the——in the office, I mean, you knew that he was in custody, right? [Roets]: Yes, I did. [State]: And you knew
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19017 - 2005-07-13
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, yes. That is your option." Bartelt responded, "I think I'd prefer that." At 5:45 p.m., roughly 33
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208647 - 2018-02-20
, yes. That is your option." Bartelt responded, "I think I'd prefer that." At 5:45 p.m., roughly 33
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208647 - 2018-02-20
State v. Lance Terry Konrath
– have you received an [sic] a copy of the criminal complaint? DEFENDANT KONRATH: Yes, I have
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17110 - 2005-03-31
– have you received an [sic] a copy of the criminal complaint? DEFENDANT KONRATH: Yes, I have
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17110 - 2005-03-31