Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3311 - 3320 of 7645 for yes.
Search results 3311 - 3320 of 7645 for yes.
COURT OF APPEALS
off.” Schmidt took his shoes off, testifying that he “never said yes or no” to doing so. He stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87110 - 2012-09-17
off.” Schmidt took his shoes off, testifying that he “never said yes or no” to doing so. He stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87110 - 2012-09-17
State v. Jeremy J. Hanson
“yes” to both questions. The court then accepted Hanson’s plea, found him guilty of operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16265 - 2005-03-31
“yes” to both questions. The court then accepted Hanson’s plea, found him guilty of operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16265 - 2005-03-31
Mary Ann Wendt v. Clifford Wendt
of circumstances has been shown. The Court finds that yes, it has. The substantial change is the fact that Mrs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5796 - 2005-03-31
of circumstances has been shown. The Court finds that yes, it has. The substantial change is the fact that Mrs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5796 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ruth M. Davis
.” The officer asked if she had been drinking and Davis answered yes, she had had three drinks at work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19140 - 2008-03-17
.” The officer asked if she had been drinking and Davis answered yes, she had had three drinks at work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19140 - 2008-03-17
State v. Rodney R. Clark
. Clark, that you have gone over this fully with him, and do you fully understand it? [CLARK]: Yes, I do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2467 - 2005-03-31
. Clark, that you have gone over this fully with him, and do you fully understand it? [CLARK]: Yes, I do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2467 - 2005-03-31
State v. Matthew J. Knapp
at the——in the office, I mean, you knew that he was in custody, right? [Roets]: Yes, I did. [State]: And you knew
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19017 - 2005-07-13
at the——in the office, I mean, you knew that he was in custody, right? [Roets]: Yes, I did. [State]: And you knew
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19017 - 2005-07-13
[PDF]
State v. Matthew J. Knapp
? [Roets]: Yes, I did. [State]: And you knew that, in order to interview him effectively in custody
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19017 - 2017-09-21
? [Roets]: Yes, I did. [State]: And you knew that, in order to interview him effectively in custody
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19017 - 2017-09-21
Brown County v. Shannon R.
be yes. ¶13 The jury was instructed (in accordance with pattern instruction Wis JI-Children 324
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20457 - 2005-11-29
be yes. ¶13 The jury was instructed (in accordance with pattern instruction Wis JI-Children 324
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20457 - 2005-11-29
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, yes. That is your option." Bartelt responded, "I think I'd prefer that." At 5:45 p.m., roughly 33
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208647 - 2018-02-20
, yes. That is your option." Bartelt responded, "I think I'd prefer that." At 5:45 p.m., roughly 33
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208647 - 2018-02-20
State v. Lance Terry Konrath
– have you received an [sic] a copy of the criminal complaint? DEFENDANT KONRATH: Yes, I have
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17110 - 2005-03-31
– have you received an [sic] a copy of the criminal complaint? DEFENDANT KONRATH: Yes, I have
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17110 - 2005-03-31