Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33101 - 33110 of 59208 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 33101 - 33110 of 59208 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
claim for relief. Brown was not “resentenced.” The trial court has the authority to modify the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48431 - 2010-03-29
claim for relief. Brown was not “resentenced.” The trial court has the authority to modify the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48431 - 2010-03-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” No. 2023AP283-CR 5 favor at sentencing.” The postconviction court ordered briefing on Clayborn’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=839893 - 2024-08-20
.” No. 2023AP283-CR 5 favor at sentencing.” The postconviction court ordered briefing on Clayborn’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=839893 - 2024-08-20
[PDF]
WI 66
Dade to discuss her case and the plea agreement. E.D. again claimed that the divorce hearing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29263 - 2014-09-15
Dade to discuss her case and the plea agreement. E.D. again claimed that the divorce hearing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29263 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Barbara Gardner v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
1 The jury awarded nothing to Barbara for her claim seeking compensation for the loss of aid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4084 - 2017-09-20
1 The jury awarded nothing to Barbara for her claim seeking compensation for the loss of aid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4084 - 2017-09-20
State v. Frank A. Normington
is no longer a sexually violent person. Normington claims: (1) he was deprived of due process and his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13913 - 2005-03-31
is no longer a sexually violent person. Normington claims: (1) he was deprived of due process and his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13913 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Roger H. Leiskau
woman and Sara before the mirror were relevant to the State's claim that when Leiskau touched Sara's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8522 - 2017-09-19
woman and Sara before the mirror were relevant to the State's claim that when Leiskau touched Sara's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8522 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the 1999 lease and addendum. This influence was evidenced, Mednikow claimed, by extremely favorable lease
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32390 - 2008-04-07
the 1999 lease and addendum. This influence was evidenced, Mednikow claimed, by extremely favorable lease
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32390 - 2008-04-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the residence, as Zens had claimed. ¶7 Furthermore, these facts were in addition to Zens’ knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629921 - 2023-03-07
of the residence, as Zens had claimed. ¶7 Furthermore, these facts were in addition to Zens’ knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629921 - 2023-03-07
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment against Valek and Smith in the amount of $307,252.99, the amount JG Development claimed was still
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95615 - 2013-04-17
judgment against Valek and Smith in the amount of $307,252.99, the amount JG Development claimed was still
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95615 - 2013-04-17
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Alan D. Eisenberg
retainer should be forwarded on along with the file. The associate claimed $2775.69 of the retainer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16591 - 2017-09-21
retainer should be forwarded on along with the file. The associate claimed $2775.69 of the retainer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16591 - 2017-09-21