Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33101 - 33110 of 56136 for so.

State v. Evelio Duarte-Vestar
). Even so, disqualification is required under § 757.19(2), Stats., only when the judge determines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15257 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
in your jury questionnaire.” The trial court concluded, “So I’m satisfied that the six people who have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107739 - 2014-02-04

State v. James F. Emerich
, 804, 285 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979). Emerich has not done so here. Thus, Emerich has preserved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2359 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
so. This is not a case where a theory of defense was entirely overlooked and not presented at all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846458 - 2024-09-06

CA Blank Order
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99690 - 2013-07-23

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
). The court considered no improper factors and the sentences are not arguably so excessive as to shock
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92923 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. James W. McCone
rule. So on this threshold basis, we reject McCone’s argument. ¶6 Moreover, we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2717 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Antuan Mcclinton
(If "Special" JUDGE: J. Richard Long so indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7809 - 2017-09-19

State v. Kurt W. Meyer
that are raised for the first time on appeal, and we see no reason to do so in this case. Wirth v. Ehly, 93 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5750 - 2005-03-31

State v. Shamseldin Ali Abdelwarress
: It's okay either way. I mean we can try the case. We're right in the middle of it. So you intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9685 - 2005-03-31