Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33111 - 33120 of 43375 for legal seperation.

COURT OF APPEALS
to relief’” is a legal question that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89199 - 2012-11-13

James M. Povolny v. James B. Totzke
to the court, the court concluded as both a factual and legal matter that the town road had been abandoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5883 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
) (“[a] person having a legal right to enforce execution of a judgment for a specific sum of money”). ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89520 - 2012-11-27

[PDF] Kay Hoverman v. Chuck Frautschi
“is not knowledgeable in legal interpretation and may not know what is, or is not, patently criminal.” This court
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12736 - 2017-09-21

County of Dodge v. Curtis E. Dittberner
). This is a practical test based on “‘considerations of everyday life on which reasonable and prudent men, not legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16167 - 2005-03-31

State v. Victory Fireworks, Inc.
carriers of restricted fireworks because this issue does not affect the legality of the sale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15057 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
concentration at the time of the collision was 0.258%—well above the 0.02% legal limit for a driver with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118087 - 2014-07-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and was therefore legal. We also agree with appellate counsel’s conclusion that the trial court properly exercised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100068 - 2017-09-21

Erland Anderson v. Dale Peterson
N.W.2d 743, 747 (Ct. App. 1989). The factual basis for deciding the legal issues was not adequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14608 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
, but the record must reflect the trial court’s “reasoned application of the appropriate legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12127 - 2017-09-21