Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33121 - 33130 of 64040 for records/1000.
Search results 33121 - 33130 of 64040 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by denying his postconviction motion without a hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705569 - 2023-09-21
by denying his postconviction motion without a hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705569 - 2023-09-21
State v. Sandy Pegues
’ Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Because the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20983 - 2006-01-24
’ Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Because the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20983 - 2006-01-24
[PDF]
State v. James Sanicki, Jr.
review of the record, however, we conclude that the original postconviction motion was necessarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3808 - 2017-09-20
review of the record, however, we conclude that the original postconviction motion was necessarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3808 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
to further prepare or to obtain new counsel. Therefore, the record does not warrant resentencing. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33655 - 2008-08-11
to further prepare or to obtain new counsel. Therefore, the record does not warrant resentencing. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33655 - 2008-08-11
State v. Gwen L.P.
sense, the record offers some support for Gwen L.P.'s argument. In both its stated verdicts and written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10488 - 2005-03-31
sense, the record offers some support for Gwen L.P.'s argument. In both its stated verdicts and written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10488 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eric J. Heine
2 Heine argues that “there is nothing in the record to indicate how many [signals] are needed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13571 - 2017-09-21
2 Heine argues that “there is nothing in the record to indicate how many [signals] are needed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13571 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, there was not a sufficient factual basis to support that Gierczak obstructed an officer because the record did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90589 - 2012-12-12
, there was not a sufficient factual basis to support that Gierczak obstructed an officer because the record did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90589 - 2012-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
without deciding that Veronika has identified a right to a summary judgment hearing, the record plainly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113168 - 2017-09-21
without deciding that Veronika has identified a right to a summary judgment hearing, the record plainly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113168 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=543049 - 2022-07-13
independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=543049 - 2022-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
played two audio recordings for the jury. One was S.P.’s 911 call. The other was a recording made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82114 - 2012-05-07
played two audio recordings for the jury. One was S.P.’s 911 call. The other was a recording made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82114 - 2012-05-07