Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33121 - 33130 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 33121 - 33130 of 64042 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. David R. Messner
to protect the public and Messner’s lengthy criminal record in sentencing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15553 - 2017-09-21
to protect the public and Messner’s lengthy criminal record in sentencing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15553 - 2017-09-21
State v. James Sanicki, Jr.
and the facts of record.” Id. at 500. ¶7 A trial court may grant a new trial based on newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3808 - 2011-03-31
and the facts of record.” Id. at 500. ¶7 A trial court may grant a new trial based on newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3808 - 2011-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of records.” ¶5 Sallis testified: � She made “three fake appointments for 6:00, 6:15, and 6:30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84242 - 2014-09-15
of records.” ¶5 Sallis testified: � She made “three fake appointments for 6:00, 6:15, and 6:30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84242 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Wesley J. LaCrosse, Jr.
of his employment at the time or in the manner prescribed by law.5 ¶7 The record discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15431 - 2017-09-21
of his employment at the time or in the manner prescribed by law.5 ¶7 The record discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15431 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
for resentencing “because the sentencing-after-revocation record does not reflect the sentencing judge’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36732 - 2014-09-15
for resentencing “because the sentencing-after-revocation record does not reflect the sentencing judge’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36732 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Kroeger asserts there was no basis in the record for the court’s decision to award him only $250. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483690 - 2022-02-15
, Kroeger asserts there was no basis in the record for the court’s decision to award him only $250. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483690 - 2022-02-15
State v. Brian J. Dorsey
of fact, presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18503 - 2005-06-13
of fact, presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18503 - 2005-06-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
acknowledged that cell records do not provide definitive information about where a cell phone is located
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371961 - 2021-09-13
acknowledged that cell records do not provide definitive information about where a cell phone is located
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371961 - 2021-09-13
[PDF]
Steven B. Skrede v. John B. Spears
) and that their claim was eventually disallowed, although the parties do not refer us to any portion of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10636 - 2017-09-20
) and that their claim was eventually disallowed, although the parties do not refer us to any portion of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10636 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
airport. The court concluded that it was undisputed in the summary judgment record that the Gebhardts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47195 - 2010-02-23
airport. The court concluded that it was undisputed in the summary judgment record that the Gebhardts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47195 - 2010-02-23