Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33131 - 33140 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33131 - 33140 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. James Peterson
sometime between December 1991 and May 1992. The defense moved for a preliminary hearing, and the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13437 - 2005-03-31
sometime between December 1991 and May 1992. The defense moved for a preliminary hearing, and the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13437 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in “debriefing” with law enforcement while his cases were pending would be a new factor supporting a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219680 - 2018-09-20
in “debriefing” with law enforcement while his cases were pending would be a new factor supporting a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219680 - 2018-09-20
Tina Harmon v. City of Milwaukee
the comparative negligence of the parties. The City claims: (1) the trial court erred when it ruled on a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13045 - 2005-03-31
the comparative negligence of the parties. The City claims: (1) the trial court erred when it ruled on a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13045 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rick E. Norem
., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 CANE, C.J. Rick Norem appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3759 - 2017-09-19
., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 CANE, C.J. Rick Norem appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3759 - 2017-09-19
State v. Dustin W. B.
ANDERSON, J.[1] We affirm the trial court’s denial of Dustin W. B.’s motions challenging the legality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5191 - 2005-03-31
ANDERSON, J.[1] We affirm the trial court’s denial of Dustin W. B.’s motions challenging the legality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5191 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presiding, denied the motion. At the ensuing preliminary hearing, however, the court found probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88551 - 2014-09-15
presiding, denied the motion. At the ensuing preliminary hearing, however, the court found probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88551 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Walworth v. Patrick Wolf
notes from the October 31, 2001 motion hearing were incomplete due to technical problems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5311 - 2017-09-19
notes from the October 31, 2001 motion hearing were incomplete due to technical problems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5311 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Frank A. H.
postconviction motion challenging the effectiveness of trial counsel at sentencing. On appeal, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5061 - 2017-09-19
postconviction motion challenging the effectiveness of trial counsel at sentencing. On appeal, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5061 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mario M. Martinez
postconviction motion for resentencing. Martinez claims: (1) No. 00-1746-CR 2 the trial court relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2751 - 2017-09-19
postconviction motion for resentencing. Martinez claims: (1) No. 00-1746-CR 2 the trial court relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2751 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction, entered on a jury’s verdict, and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207696 - 2018-01-30
of conviction, entered on a jury’s verdict, and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207696 - 2018-01-30