Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33131 - 33140 of 56136 for so.
Search results 33131 - 33140 of 56136 for so.
COURT OF APPEALS
, the State agreed to recommend that the court withhold adjudication so the matter could be referred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56016 - 2010-10-27
, the State agreed to recommend that the court withhold adjudication so the matter could be referred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56016 - 2010-10-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response but has not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644732 - 2023-04-19
to file a response but has not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644732 - 2023-04-19
[PDF]
State v. Marlon Spears
at the preliminary hearing she testified that he did so over her clothing. He argues that by impeaching her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12039 - 2017-09-21
at the preliminary hearing she testified that he did so over her clothing. He argues that by impeaching her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12039 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
so. This is not a case where a theory of defense was entirely overlooked and not presented at all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846458 - 2024-09-06
so. This is not a case where a theory of defense was entirely overlooked and not presented at all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846458 - 2024-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not challenge the sentence as unduly harsh or so excessive as to shock public sentiment. See Ocanas v. State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885624 - 2024-12-05
not challenge the sentence as unduly harsh or so excessive as to shock public sentiment. See Ocanas v. State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885624 - 2024-12-05
David J. Geisler v. Marc S. Baldwin
so rule, it was not essential to the judgment. The Geislers’ priority as the first to validly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5618 - 2005-03-31
so rule, it was not essential to the judgment. The Geislers’ priority as the first to validly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5618 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
or experience of jurors so that a jury could only speculate as to what inferences to draw. Ollman v. Wisconsin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101872 - 2013-09-09
or experience of jurors so that a jury could only speculate as to what inferences to draw. Ollman v. Wisconsin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101872 - 2013-09-09
State v. Alberto B. Flores
, Flores did not do so, and the issue is deemed abandoned in the trial court. See id.; see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13826 - 2005-03-31
, Flores did not do so, and the issue is deemed abandoned in the trial court. See id.; see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13826 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
) (“[a]ny ground finally adjudicated or not so raised, or knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33662 - 2008-08-11
) (“[a]ny ground finally adjudicated or not so raised, or knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33662 - 2008-08-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the convictions unless the evidence, viewed most favorably to the State, is so insufficient in probative value
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901381 - 2025-01-16
the convictions unless the evidence, viewed most favorably to the State, is so insufficient in probative value
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901381 - 2025-01-16