Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33131 - 33140 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 33131 - 33140 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Village of Fontana v. Lynn M. Zais
that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence. Wisconsin Stat. § 343.303 allows officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5372 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence. Wisconsin Stat. § 343.303 allows officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5372 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236524 - 2019-03-06
that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236524 - 2019-03-06
[PDF]
State v. Spencer S. Henderson
. § 346.63(1)(a) as a second offense. He asserts that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5512 - 2017-09-19
. § 346.63(1)(a) as a second offense. He asserts that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5512 - 2017-09-19
Lynda M. Boser Larson v. Bernard Seidling
on a land contract. The trial court concluded the land contract was ambiguous as to the starting date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2908 - 2005-03-31
on a land contract. The trial court concluded the land contract was ambiguous as to the starting date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2908 - 2005-03-31
Allstate Insurance Company v. Volkswagen of America
of the Dietrich’s Volkswagen automobile, and this interlocutory appeal also concerns the trial court’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6903 - 2005-03-31
of the Dietrich’s Volkswagen automobile, and this interlocutory appeal also concerns the trial court’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6903 - 2005-03-31
Jeffrey A. Librande v. Allstate Insurance Company
cut down a tree in the fall of 1998. The trial court held, as a matter of law, that the policy did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7018 - 2005-03-31
cut down a tree in the fall of 1998. The trial court held, as a matter of law, that the policy did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7018 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
information. We affirm. ¶2 Many of the facts were stipulated at trial. DeBraska was the president
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75794 - 2011-12-27
information. We affirm. ¶2 Many of the facts were stipulated at trial. DeBraska was the president
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75794 - 2011-12-27
State v. Jason P. Sypher
test, with a 0.15% result. Following the trial court’s denial of Sypher’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16213 - 2005-03-31
test, with a 0.15% result. Following the trial court’s denial of Sypher’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16213 - 2005-03-31
Kathy Elrod v. Elroy Brommer
motion for a temporary injunction, the trial court determined that Kathy did not have standing to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3678 - 2005-03-31
motion for a temporary injunction, the trial court determined that Kathy did not have standing to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3678 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[e]ither party may file a demand for trial within 10 days from the date of an oral decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190821 - 2017-09-21
that “[e]ither party may file a demand for trial within 10 days from the date of an oral decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190821 - 2017-09-21