Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33141 - 33150 of 44612 for part.

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Stacey C.
)(a), which states in relevant part: Abandonment, which, subject to par. (c), shall be established by proving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5007 - 2005-03-31

State v. Anthony Harris
apparently relied, at least in part, on a `target' theory of standing that the United States Supreme Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9175 - 2005-03-31

State v. Olton Lee Dumas
), Stats. states in relevant part: “The actor is a repeater if the actor was convicted of a felony during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12649 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of describing the collateral. We note that the reference to “item and type” is made as part of an example (“i.e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69206 - 2011-08-08

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
in 2006 to a substantial term of imprisonment and extended supervision. As a part of sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989608 - 2025-07-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Morocco on September 19, 2022. Attorney Meyeroff cited to a “parting of the ways” and the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1006351 - 2025-09-09

City of Milwaukee v. Thaddeus J. Derynda
)1 provides, in part: (b) Raze order. The governing body, building inspector or other designated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4638 - 2005-03-31

State v. Thomas G. Martwick
in which the leaves were seized was indeed part of the curtilage of Martwick’s home and therefore Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13515 - 2005-03-31

Ann E. Bates v. John P. Dwyer
that he did not sign the second mortgage, nor did he take part in the settlement negotiations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16120 - 2005-03-31

State v. Stuart M. Buzzell
was not part of the community caretaker function and was unlawful because the officer did not have a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3494 - 2005-03-31