Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33151 - 33160 of 82993 for case codes/1000.
Search results 33151 - 33160 of 82993 for case codes/1000.
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Brian C.
that he had just been appointed to the case and needed time to prepare. He did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4168 - 2005-03-31
that he had just been appointed to the case and needed time to prepare. He did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4168 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas E. Howk, Jr.
In so holding, the Kassube court rejected the defendant’s reliance on the Mississippi case of Boyd v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6973 - 2005-03-31
In so holding, the Kassube court rejected the defendant’s reliance on the Mississippi case of Boyd v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6973 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lawrence G. Wickert v. John Burggraf
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1996 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11099 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1996 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11099 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gregory A. Gibbs
N.W.2d 115, 116‑17 (1996). None of the six fact-specific situations are applicable to this case.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11153 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 115, 116‑17 (1996). None of the six fact-specific situations are applicable to this case.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11153 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96238 - 2014-09-15
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96238 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Brian C.
for Brian explained to the court that he had just been appointed to the case and needed time to prepare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4168 - 2017-09-20
for Brian explained to the court that he had just been appointed to the case and needed time to prepare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4168 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
facts of the case.” State v. Nelson, 146 Wis. 2d 442, 448, 432 N.W.2d 115 (Ct. App. 1988). “We place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192159 - 2017-09-21
facts of the case.” State v. Nelson, 146 Wis. 2d 442, 448, 432 N.W.2d 115 (Ct. App. 1988). “We place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192159 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). In this case, based upon the suppression hearing evidence the circuit court could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465853 - 2021-12-21
omitted). In this case, based upon the suppression hearing evidence the circuit court could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465853 - 2021-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1021970 - 2025-10-16
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1021970 - 2025-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
. We affirm. ¶2 This case arises from a home invasion by ejected partygoers. James, Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52620 - 2010-07-27
. We affirm. ¶2 This case arises from a home invasion by ejected partygoers. James, Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52620 - 2010-07-27