Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33161 - 33170 of 83513 for case code.
Search results 33161 - 33170 of 83513 for case code.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610223 - 2023-01-18
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610223 - 2023-01-18
State v. Orbbie Williams
appealed. ¶3 On appeal, we reversed and remanded the case to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19806 - 2005-10-03
appealed. ¶3 On appeal, we reversed and remanded the case to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19806 - 2005-10-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in a petition by entering a no contest plea, as in this case, the court nevertheless “shall hear testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032914 - 2025-11-04
in a petition by entering a no contest plea, as in this case, the court nevertheless “shall hear testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032914 - 2025-11-04
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert Glickman
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-1758-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17123 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-1758-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17123 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ignacio P. Gonzalez
the protection of Wisconsin’s roads, the trial court failed to consider case law precedent which held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16294 - 2005-03-31
the protection of Wisconsin’s roads, the trial court failed to consider case law precedent which held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16294 - 2005-03-31
Siu Wing Leung v. City of Lake Geneva
2003 WI App 129 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-2747 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5771 - 2005-03-31
2003 WI App 129 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-2747 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5771 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Morrow’s arguments and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801205 - 2024-05-14
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Morrow’s arguments and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801205 - 2024-05-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the case was due primarily to (1) the unavailability of a state witness; and (2) the fact that Whitelow’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149305 - 2017-09-21
the case was due primarily to (1) the unavailability of a state witness; and (2) the fact that Whitelow’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149305 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of Sugden’s knowledge as the case was presented to the jury. ¶6 When determining the probative value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98118 - 2013-06-12
of Sugden’s knowledge as the case was presented to the jury. ¶6 When determining the probative value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98118 - 2013-06-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436084 - 2021-10-06
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436084 - 2021-10-06