Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33171 - 33180 of 61989 for child support.
Search results 33171 - 33180 of 61989 for child support.
State v. Dean F. Bertrand
), in support. Bertrand’s reliance is misplaced. The issue in Taylor was whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12605 - 2005-03-31
), in support. Bertrand’s reliance is misplaced. The issue in Taylor was whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12605 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas E. Formaro
issue a warrant authorizing the search of Formaro’s home. In his affidavit in support of the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4164 - 2005-03-31
issue a warrant authorizing the search of Formaro’s home. In his affidavit in support of the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4164 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the refusal hearing was insufficient to support the stop of his vehicle. The circuit court disagreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183670 - 2017-09-21
at the refusal hearing was insufficient to support the stop of his vehicle. The circuit court disagreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183670 - 2017-09-21
Secura Insurance v. Margaret A. Schuirmann
no support for her argument that the “Michigan Certification Form” should apply to cases brought in states
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2129 - 2005-03-31
no support for her argument that the “Michigan Certification Form” should apply to cases brought in states
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2129 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction. We disagree and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 On July
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35495 - 2014-09-15
there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction. We disagree and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 On July
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35495 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
might prove in support of their allegations.” Id. First, insofar as Shelton continues to argue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=418350 - 2021-08-31
might prove in support of their allegations.” Id. First, insofar as Shelton continues to argue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=418350 - 2021-08-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to support the [circuit] court’s decision, or [an appellate] court finds that the [circuit] court applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183673 - 2017-09-21
to support the [circuit] court’s decision, or [an appellate] court finds that the [circuit] court applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183673 - 2017-09-21
State v. Craig J. Anderson
substantial issues of fact regarding matters in which he participated and his claims are supported by more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12555 - 2005-03-31
substantial issues of fact regarding matters in which he participated and his claims are supported by more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12555 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the totality of the circumstances supported detaining the occupants, and it denied Ponfil’s motion. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191171 - 2017-09-21
the totality of the circumstances supported detaining the occupants, and it denied Ponfil’s motion. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191171 - 2017-09-21
State v. Thomas G. Martwick
166, 189, 560 N.W.2d 246, 256 (1997). Our conclusion finds further support in Fourth Amendment cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13515 - 2005-03-31
166, 189, 560 N.W.2d 246, 256 (1997). Our conclusion finds further support in Fourth Amendment cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13515 - 2005-03-31