Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33171 - 33180 of 38217 for ph d.
Search results 33171 - 33180 of 38217 for ph d.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Recommended for publication in the official reports. No. 2007AP2886(D) ¶23 DYKMAN, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40081 - 2009-08-26
. Recommended for publication in the official reports. No. 2007AP2886(D) ¶23 DYKMAN, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40081 - 2009-08-26
[PDF]
WI 52
in circuit court if a person convicted of a violation may be ordered to pay a forfeiture. (d) Recorded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36828 - 2014-09-15
in circuit court if a person convicted of a violation may be ordered to pay a forfeiture. (d) Recorded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36828 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” DANIEL D. BLINKA, 7 WISCONSIN PRACTICE SERIES, WISCONSIN EVIDENCE § 608.2, at 481 (3d ed. 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102038 - 2017-09-21
.” DANIEL D. BLINKA, 7 WISCONSIN PRACTICE SERIES, WISCONSIN EVIDENCE § 608.2, at 481 (3d ed. 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102038 - 2017-09-21
State v. Vairin M.
under s. 938.538 or the adult intensive sanctions program under s. 301.048. (d) The desirability
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16485 - 2005-03-31
under s. 938.538 or the adult intensive sanctions program under s. 301.048. (d) The desirability
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16485 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. A. Gagliano Co., Inc.
of the circuit court for Dane County: STEVEN D. EBERT, Judge. Reversed. Before Deininger, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18373 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court for Dane County: STEVEN D. EBERT, Judge. Reversed. Before Deininger, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18373 - 2017-09-21
2010 WI APP 115
. No. 2009AP1877(D) ¶35 DYKMAN, P.J. (dissenting). Once again, the majority has scoured an administrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52659 - 2011-08-21
. No. 2009AP1877(D) ¶35 DYKMAN, P.J. (dissenting). Once again, the majority has scoured an administrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52659 - 2011-08-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-RESPONDENT, V. RAPHAEL D. TURNER, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211854 - 2018-04-25
-RESPONDENT, V. RAPHAEL D. TURNER, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211854 - 2018-04-25
2010 WI APP 47
explicit conduct under all of the following circumstances [is guilty of a class D felony]: (a) The person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48502 - 2010-04-25
explicit conduct under all of the following circumstances [is guilty of a class D felony]: (a) The person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48502 - 2010-04-25
2011 WI APP 13
or 822.28. (d) No court of any other state would have jurisdiction under the criteria specified in par
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57550 - 2012-01-22
or 822.28. (d) No court of any other state would have jurisdiction under the criteria specified in par
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57550 - 2012-01-22
[PDF]
WI App 29
basis; or (d) the interpretation “directly contravenes the words of the ordinance” or rule. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211341 - 2018-09-18
basis; or (d) the interpretation “directly contravenes the words of the ordinance” or rule. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211341 - 2018-09-18

