Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33181 - 33190 of 83001 for case codes/1000.

State v. Timothy J. Seaman
763 (1990), our supreme court addressed the policy considerations at work in a case involving a Terry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4630 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Mark Alan Szarkowitz
of a firearm and felony bailjumping, again as a repeat offender. These cases were consolidated in January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6163 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and circumstances of this case, Lamar is entitled to an award of litigation expenses under WIS. STAT. § 32.28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231135 - 2019-05-23

COURT OF APPEALS
excerpts from Craig’s statements during its case-in-chief. The circuit court summarized Craig’s admissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70796 - 2011-09-12

William Engelhart v. June C. Engelhart
… and an identity of claims in the two cases.” Id. We use a “transactional approach” to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13404 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
in this case is whether the information held by the police could give rise to reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28500 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Brian Torgerson v. Reuben Johnson & Son, Inc.
under construction. Id. at 53, 163 N.W.2d at 194. The special employer in this case, Sowles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9813 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
) and to ensure a fair and equitable financial arrangement between the parties in each individual case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27279 - 2014-09-15

David Burch v. Village of Hammond
. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994), should apply here. In Dolan, a case dealing with Fifth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5947 - 2005-03-31

James C. Eaton v. Anne Paula Eaton
of this case: the length of the marriage—20 years; the age and health of the parties; the property division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8752 - 2005-03-31