Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33181 - 33190 of 40043 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 33181 - 33190 of 40043 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the alleged Bangert violation is the following statement: “The plea transcript is certainly most brief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204230 - 2017-11-28
to the alleged Bangert violation is the following statement: “The plea transcript is certainly most brief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204230 - 2017-11-28
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. R.
of the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2 Michael does not provide a statement of the facts for our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20578 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2 Michael does not provide a statement of the facts for our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20578 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of the trial court’s statement, we decline Bunch’s request. ¶17 The trial court observed that the only way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78325 - 2012-02-21
of the trial court’s statement, we decline Bunch’s request. ¶17 The trial court observed that the only way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78325 - 2012-02-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress, “I’ve got to assume he was close enough … to have it affect him.” Implicit in this statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81889 - 2012-05-02
to suppress, “I’ve got to assume he was close enough … to have it affect him.” Implicit in this statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81889 - 2012-05-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
and personal jurisdiction over Wine; (14) the statements by the victims and witnesses were too inconsistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30817 - 2014-09-15
and personal jurisdiction over Wine; (14) the statements by the victims and witnesses were too inconsistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30817 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
statements because the police officer who stopped him had neither reasonable suspicion for the stop nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34556 - 2008-11-11
statements because the police officer who stopped him had neither reasonable suspicion for the stop nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34556 - 2008-11-11
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony and previous statements do not force the conclusion that he or she is wholly incredible. Ruiz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109567 - 2014-05-04
testimony and previous statements do not force the conclusion that he or she is wholly incredible. Ruiz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109567 - 2014-05-04
City of Prescott v. Gary Holmgren
, and a statement of the claims made. One of the exceptions contained in Wis. Stat. § 893.33(5) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25960 - 2006-08-29
, and a statement of the claims made. One of the exceptions contained in Wis. Stat. § 893.33(5) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25960 - 2006-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
” (emphasis added) in its statement of the case and the facts. Bethke’s references were to his own appendix
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111132 - 2014-04-29
” (emphasis added) in its statement of the case and the facts. Bethke’s references were to his own appendix
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111132 - 2014-04-29
[PDF]
State v. Andres Godina
the agent’s recommendation where there was no such statement in the record. Cf. Brozovich Nos. 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13093 - 2017-09-21
the agent’s recommendation where there was no such statement in the record. Cf. Brozovich Nos. 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13093 - 2017-09-21