Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33181 - 33190 of 39839 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 33181 - 33190 of 39839 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Gamel S. Hegwood
supported by counsel’s statements that his client had stopped speaking to him. Although there was other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5491 - 2005-03-31
supported by counsel’s statements that his client had stopped speaking to him. Although there was other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5491 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and violence.” The court considered statements from Upton’s uncle, an attorney, who said that Upton “had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369693 - 2021-05-26
and violence.” The court considered statements from Upton’s uncle, an attorney, who said that Upton “had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369693 - 2021-05-26
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth W. Raush
and defense 3 It is not enough that there is a statement in the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10787 - 2017-09-20
and defense 3 It is not enough that there is a statement in the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10787 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“appropriate references to the record” (emphasis added) in its statement of the case and the facts. Bethke’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111132 - 2017-09-21
“appropriate references to the record” (emphasis added) in its statement of the case and the facts. Bethke’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111132 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
Jackson’s appeal was frivolous under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.25(3)(c)2. In her Statement on Transcript, filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37112 - 2014-09-15
Jackson’s appeal was frivolous under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.25(3)(c)2. In her Statement on Transcript, filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37112 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the court’s oral statements at sentencing, the court filled out a written explanation of the determinate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143231 - 2017-09-21
to the court’s oral statements at sentencing, the court filled out a written explanation of the determinate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143231 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
first appeal would not be considered, despite his statement to the contrary, because we concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35557 - 2014-09-15
first appeal would not be considered, despite his statement to the contrary, because we concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35557 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Chad D. Everts
’ motion finding that Sloan’s testimony at the motion hearing was consistent with his statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5473 - 2017-09-19
’ motion finding that Sloan’s testimony at the motion hearing was consistent with his statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5473 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Sol Coleman, Jr. v. Michael Sullivan
certified copy of Coleman’s trust fund accounts statement, see § 814.29(1m)(b)2, STATS., reveal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14472 - 2017-09-21
certified copy of Coleman’s trust fund accounts statement, see § 814.29(1m)(b)2, STATS., reveal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14472 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a statement by the witness that he did not care to see. The court found him guilty of count one, dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34834 - 2008-12-09
a statement by the witness that he did not care to see. The court found him guilty of count one, dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34834 - 2008-12-09