Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33191 - 33200 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33191 - 33200 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Hempel appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification alleging a new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93296 - 2014-09-15
Hempel appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification alleging a new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93296 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Brophy in all five cases, and Brophy did not appeal. ¶3 In January 2010, Brophy filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61920 - 2011-03-28
Brophy in all five cases, and Brophy did not appeal. ¶3 In January 2010, Brophy filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61920 - 2011-03-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
related to his domestic abuse of R.H. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. He
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449515 - 2021-11-09
related to his domestic abuse of R.H. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. He
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449515 - 2021-11-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
granting Matthew Meehan’s motion to suppress evidence in his criminal case. Meehan has failed to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=554354 - 2022-08-11
granting Matthew Meehan’s motion to suppress evidence in his criminal case. Meehan has failed to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=554354 - 2022-08-11
[PDF]
State v. Deandra S. Carter
erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence. She claims the arresting officers lacked reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12704 - 2017-09-21
erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence. She claims the arresting officers lacked reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12704 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ladarwin D. Copeland
an order for reconfinement after revocation of extended supervision and an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25908 - 2017-09-21
an order for reconfinement after revocation of extended supervision and an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25908 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
based on: (1) the circuit court order denying Thompson’s motion to suppress; (2) Thompson’s no-contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107784 - 2014-02-03
based on: (1) the circuit court order denying Thompson’s motion to suppress; (2) Thompson’s no-contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107784 - 2014-02-03
COURT OF APPEALS
granting Hoffer’s motion to voluntarily dismiss this condemnation review action after the court entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111336 - 2014-04-30
granting Hoffer’s motion to voluntarily dismiss this condemnation review action after the court entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111336 - 2014-04-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the circuit court’s prior ruling regarding the tax deductibility of the maintenance payments. Her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813303 - 2024-06-19
in the circuit court’s prior ruling regarding the tax deductibility of the maintenance payments. Her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813303 - 2024-06-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
(2005-06).1 The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously denied Lambert’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40224 - 2014-09-15
(2005-06).1 The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously denied Lambert’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40224 - 2014-09-15