Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3321 - 3330 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3321 - 3330 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Mark O. Williams
is identical in law to the assault charge for the same event. Williams also appeals a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5692 - 2005-03-31
is identical in law to the assault charge for the same event. Williams also appeals a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5692 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark O. Williams
a postconviction motion order denying him six days’ sentencing credit, arguing that his custody in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5692 - 2017-09-19
a postconviction motion order denying him six days’ sentencing credit, arguing that his custody in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5692 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. ¶2 Wren argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=570533 - 2022-09-27
postconviction motion. ¶2 Wren argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=570533 - 2022-09-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the incident, Christina was pregnant with Delairra. Delano was taken into custody on March 28, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109215 - 2017-09-21
of the incident, Christina was pregnant with Delairra. Delano was taken into custody on March 28, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109215 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Delano with the motion because it had no address for him after his release from custody. Nonetheless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109215 - 2014-03-13
Delano with the motion because it had no address for him after his release from custody. Nonetheless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109215 - 2014-03-13
[PDF]
State v. Stephen E. Lee
cause determination. The trial court denied the motion. The trial court held that Lee was in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14485 - 2017-09-21
cause determination. The trial court denied the motion. The trial court held that Lee was in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14485 - 2017-09-21
Lawyer Regulation System of the State of Wisconsin v. David C. Williams
seeking to reestablish joint custody of his children, Attorney Ray began yelling at the sister of her
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16701 - 2005-03-31
seeking to reestablish joint custody of his children, Attorney Ray began yelling at the sister of her
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16701 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lawyer Regulation System of the State of Wisconsin v. David C. Williams
, while representing a father seeking to reestablish joint custody of his children, Attorney Ray began
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16701 - 2017-09-21
, while representing a father seeking to reestablish joint custody of his children, Attorney Ray began
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16701 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the State’s motion to dismiss, holding that while Shelton should not have been kept in custody for 143 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59277 - 2011-01-25
the State’s motion to dismiss, holding that while Shelton should not have been kept in custody for 143 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59277 - 2011-01-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
corpus claim is moot, and that sentence credit is not applicable because Shelton’s custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59277 - 2014-09-15
corpus claim is moot, and that sentence credit is not applicable because Shelton’s custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59277 - 2014-09-15