Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3321 - 3330 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
Search results 3321 - 3330 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
Andy Saltarikos v. Hart Donley
their security deposit within twenty-one days as required by Wis. Admin. Code § ATCP 134.06(2)(a) (2002).[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5164 - 2005-03-31
their security deposit within twenty-one days as required by Wis. Admin. Code § ATCP 134.06(2)(a) (2002).[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5164 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ronald L. Paul v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
the vacancy, and the department would request that Paul's name be removed from the list per WIS. ADM. CODE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10039 - 2017-09-19
the vacancy, and the department would request that Paul's name be removed from the list per WIS. ADM. CODE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10039 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
COUNTY CODE ch. 24 is not ripe for adjudication; WIS. STAT. § 66.0401(1) requires a case-by-case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35714 - 2014-09-15
COUNTY CODE ch. 24 is not ripe for adjudication; WIS. STAT. § 66.0401(1) requires a case-by-case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35714 - 2014-09-15
State v. Eric D. Gillespie
2005 WI App 35 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 04-1758-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7581 - 2005-03-31
2005 WI App 35 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 04-1758-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7581 - 2005-03-31
David Donisi v. Sharon McGann
on the property, however, after learning about some uncorrected building code violations and other alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20381 - 2005-11-22
on the property, however, after learning about some uncorrected building code violations and other alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20381 - 2005-11-22
State v. Aaron D.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0806-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12238 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0806-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12238 - 2005-03-31
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
violation, a county ordinance violation, or a criminal code violation. While the applicable prosecutor
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29877 - 2007-07-29
violation, a county ordinance violation, or a criminal code violation. While the applicable prosecutor
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29877 - 2007-07-29
[PDF]
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
violation, a county ordinance violation, or a criminal code violation. While the applicable prosecutor
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29877 - 2014-09-15
violation, a county ordinance violation, or a criminal code violation. While the applicable prosecutor
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29877 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Walworth v. James E. O'Donnell
of § 343.10(10)(d), STATS., 1993-94,1 and WIS. ADM. CODE § TRANS 112.05(3)(b). Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12350 - 2017-09-21
of § 343.10(10)(d), STATS., 1993-94,1 and WIS. ADM. CODE § TRANS 112.05(3)(b). Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12350 - 2017-09-21
County of Walworth v. James E. O'Donnell
of § 343.10(10)(d), Stats., 1993-94,[1] and Wis. Adm. Code § Trans 112.05(3)(b). Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12350 - 2005-03-31
of § 343.10(10)(d), Stats., 1993-94,[1] and Wis. Adm. Code § Trans 112.05(3)(b). Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12350 - 2005-03-31