Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3321 - 3330 of 82997 for case codes/1000.

[PDF] Supreme Court of Wisconsin
violation, a county ordinance violation, or a criminal code violation. While the applicable prosecutor
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29877 - 2014-09-15

David Donisi v. Sharon McGann
on the property, however, after learning about some uncorrected building code violations and other alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20381 - 2005-11-22

[PDF] County of Walworth v. James E. O'Donnell
of § 343.10(10)(d), STATS., 1993-94,1 and WIS. ADM. CODE § TRANS 112.05(3)(b). Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12350 - 2017-09-21

County of Walworth v. James E. O'Donnell
of § 343.10(10)(d), Stats., 1993-94,[1] and Wis. Adm. Code § Trans 112.05(3)(b). Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12350 - 2005-03-31

Leopoldo Balderas, Jr. v. City of Milwaukee
Supervisor that the actual cost to make the subject dwelling on the subject premises code compliant exceeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15581 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Leopoldo Balderas, Jr. v. City of Milwaukee
premises code compliant exceeds 50 percent of the assessed value of the improvements divided by the ratio
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15581 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. See Wis. Admin. Code § DWD 218.08(3). In this case, the notice of hearing is dated February 22, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93280 - 2013-02-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
decision disposing of her entire case and that she would receive a notice of appeal rights upon release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93280 - 2014-09-15

Wisconsin Court System - eFile/eCourts
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/news/view.jsp?id=1728

State v. Deborah J. Zimmerman
2001 WI App 238 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-3173-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3301 - 2005-03-31