Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3321 - 3330 of 65362 for or b.
Search results 3321 - 3330 of 65362 for or b.
State v. Pamela Smith-Herzog
)(b) and one count of operating with a prohibited blood alcohol content (PAC), second offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3498 - 2005-03-31
)(b) and one count of operating with a prohibited blood alcohol content (PAC), second offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3498 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
District County Select/view Nov 21, 2025 2025AP001750-CR State v. B. M. T. [Final publication on 2026-01-21
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=11/21/2025&end_date=11/21/2025
District County Select/view Nov 21, 2025 2025AP001750-CR State v. B. M. T. [Final publication on 2026-01-21
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=11/21/2025&end_date=11/21/2025
Daniel J.R. LaCount v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
by Courtney. See Wis. Stat. § 343.15(2)(b). ¶3 In 2001, the respondents moved for a declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7111 - 2010-11-08
by Courtney. See Wis. Stat. § 343.15(2)(b). ¶3 In 2001, the respondents moved for a declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7111 - 2010-11-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.a. or b., pattern of recent acts or omissions under par. (a)2.c. or e., or recent behavior under par
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293074 - 2020-10-01
.a. or b., pattern of recent acts or omissions under par. (a)2.c. or e., or recent behavior under par
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293074 - 2020-10-01
Lisa K. Alberte v. Anew Health Care Services, Inc.
U.S.C. § 1988(b), made applicable to the Americans with Disabilities Act by 42 U.S.C. § 1981a(a)(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6945 - 2005-03-31
U.S.C. § 1988(b), made applicable to the Americans with Disabilities Act by 42 U.S.C. § 1981a(a)(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6945 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James E. Vieau v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
policy because WIS. STAT. § 632.32(6)(b)1.1 prohibits all policies that exclude “relatives” from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7527 - 2017-09-19
policy because WIS. STAT. § 632.32(6)(b)1.1 prohibits all policies that exclude “relatives” from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7527 - 2017-09-19
State v. Theodore L. Briggs
of an insurance claim, contrary to §§ 943.395(1)(b) and (2), Stats. Briggs challenges the judgment on three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12087 - 2005-03-31
of an insurance claim, contrary to §§ 943.395(1)(b) and (2), Stats. Briggs challenges the judgment on three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12087 - 2005-03-31
James E. Vieau v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Wis. Stat. § 632.32(6)(b)1.[1] prohibits all policies that exclude “relatives” from coverage. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7527 - 2005-03-31
Wis. Stat. § 632.32(6)(b)1.[1] prohibits all policies that exclude “relatives” from coverage. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7527 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Proposed Joint Discovery Plan
in the Court’s decision of November 30, 2021. b. Fact Discovery. i. The parties agree that in light
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/proposedjointdisc.pdf - 2021-12-03
in the Court’s decision of November 30, 2021. b. Fact Discovery. i. The parties agree that in light
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/proposedjointdisc.pdf - 2021-12-03
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rules petition 10-08 comment - Legal Action of Wis.
in Joni B. v. State, 202 Wis.2d 1 (1996). Petitioners urge this Court to adapt that Joni B. reasoning
/supreme/docs/1008commentlawis2.pdf - 2011-09-12
in Joni B. v. State, 202 Wis.2d 1 (1996). Petitioners urge this Court to adapt that Joni B. reasoning
/supreme/docs/1008commentlawis2.pdf - 2011-09-12