Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3321 - 3330 of 58483 for speedy trial.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that his plea was not voluntary, knowing, and intelligent, that trial counsel was ineffective in advising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219179 - 2018-09-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
argues the trial court violated his right to a fair trial by refusing to accept his guilty pleas to two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173787 - 2017-09-21

State v. Wesley S. Leonard
contends that because the trial court lacked authority to vacate the revocation, the court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14961 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
of sentencing. ¶2 The trial court sentenced Kinard to a bifurcated sentence of six years and six months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33100 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 12, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of App...
Correctional Institution, appeals a decision of the trial court that denied his postconviction motion under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35872 - 2009-03-11

COURT OF APPEALS
motion seeking a new trial based on alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. Woldmoe contends his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142665 - 2015-06-01

[PDF] John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7910 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
) was dismissed and read-in for purposes of sentencing. ¶2 The trial court sentenced Kinard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33100 - 2008-06-24

John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
the annulment of his marriage to Mary Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8227 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8227 - 2017-09-19