Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3321 - 3330 of 5316 for text.
Search results 3321 - 3330 of 5316 for text.
Scott Alan Ludtke v. Department of Corrections
of § 302.11(7)(a), Stats., “fails to harmonize and interact with other statutes cited in its very text
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10983 - 2005-03-31
of § 302.11(7)(a), Stats., “fails to harmonize and interact with other statutes cited in its very text
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10983 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
mean interpretive resources outside the statutory text—typically items of legislative history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86397 - 2014-09-15
mean interpretive resources outside the statutory text—typically items of legislative history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86397 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Joseph Mattila v. Employe Trust Funds Board
portions of the cited statute are quoted and discussed in the text of this opinion. All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2405 - 2017-09-19
portions of the cited statute are quoted and discussed in the text of this opinion. All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2405 - 2017-09-19
State v. Boon Savanh
remark[s].” Id. at 51. Rather, the text of the Clause contemplates “witnesses … bear[ing] testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19825 - 2005-12-11
remark[s].” Id. at 51. Rather, the text of the Clause contemplates “witnesses … bear[ing] testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19825 - 2005-12-11
[PDF]
State v. Richard L. Verkler
eight instances from the text of the Reitter opinion where the word “confusion” appears, and based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5335 - 2017-09-19
eight instances from the text of the Reitter opinion where the word “confusion” appears, and based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5335 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. However, our statutory interpretation is not confined to the text of that provision. We must also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=889958 - 2024-12-11
. However, our statutory interpretation is not confined to the text of that provision. We must also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=889958 - 2024-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
was “a pre-text in order to fish for criminal activity.” Blankenheim further argues Hurda’s credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143884 - 2015-07-07
was “a pre-text in order to fish for criminal activity.” Blankenheim further argues Hurda’s credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143884 - 2015-07-07
[PDF]
Wisconsin Coalition for Voter Participation, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Elections Board
on to allege that the text of the cards—notably the reference to Kelly’s ACLU award—was “nearly identical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16051 - 2017-09-21
on to allege that the text of the cards—notably the reference to Kelly’s ACLU award—was “nearly identical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16051 - 2017-09-21
Individual Subpoenaed to Appear at Waukesha County John Doe Case No. 2003 JD 001 v. J. Mac Davis
of secrecy. The text of the oath was as follows: I hereby solemnly swear that I will keep any evidence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18502 - 2005-06-08
of secrecy. The text of the oath was as follows: I hereby solemnly swear that I will keep any evidence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18502 - 2005-06-08
State v. Darrin D. Burns
text unless otherwise noted. [2] The defendant does not contest his understanding of the proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17196 - 2005-03-31
text unless otherwise noted. [2] The defendant does not contest his understanding of the proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17196 - 2005-03-31