Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33201 - 33210 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33201 - 33210 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
. §§ 943.32(2), 939.32, 939.05 (2011-12).[1] He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110255 - 2014-04-14
. §§ 943.32(2), 939.32, 939.05 (2011-12).[1] He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110255 - 2014-04-14
[PDF]
State v. Jennifer L. Anderson
, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 961.573(1) (2001-02). Anderson argues that her motion to suppress the marijuana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19414 - 2017-09-21
, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 961.573(1) (2001-02). Anderson argues that her motion to suppress the marijuana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19414 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Wegner appeals from the judgments of conviction and from the order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84916 - 2012-07-17
. Wegner appeals from the judgments of conviction and from the order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84916 - 2012-07-17
State v. James H. Lindvig
his motion for a mistrial based on the prosecutor's comment in opening statements; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10302 - 2005-03-31
his motion for a mistrial based on the prosecutor's comment in opening statements; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10302 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
contends the court should have granted his motion for a mistrial based on his assertion that one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29151 - 2014-09-15
contends the court should have granted his motion for a mistrial based on his assertion that one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29151 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James W. Breseman
, Breseman’s attorney reappeared in the case and filed a motion to withdraw Breseman’s no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13647 - 2017-09-21
, Breseman’s attorney reappeared in the case and filed a motion to withdraw Breseman’s no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13647 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a child sex crime and from an order denying his postconviction motion. We reject his challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92443 - 2013-02-05
a child sex crime and from an order denying his postconviction motion. We reject his challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92443 - 2013-02-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. On October 24, 2011, Morrison Transport filed a motion to vacate the default judgment, arguing primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92707 - 2014-09-15
. On October 24, 2011, Morrison Transport filed a motion to vacate the default judgment, arguing primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92707 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to suppress the evidence. We conclude that Wilson’s motion to suppress was properly denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364291 - 2021-05-11
motion to suppress the evidence. We conclude that Wilson’s motion to suppress was properly denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364291 - 2021-05-11
[PDF]
State v. Tammy J. Erdmann
-CR 2 motion to suppress. We conclude that the traffic stop that led to Erdmann’s arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5917 - 2017-09-19
-CR 2 motion to suppress. We conclude that the traffic stop that led to Erdmann’s arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5917 - 2017-09-19