Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33211 - 33220 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33211 - 33220 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Nikki J. Reichhoff
the trial court properly denied Reichhoff’s motion to suppress evidence No. 00-0631-CR 2 found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2350 - 2017-09-19
the trial court properly denied Reichhoff’s motion to suppress evidence No. 00-0631-CR 2 found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2350 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ladarwin D. Copeland
denying his motion for resentencing after revocation of extended supervision. Copeland argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25908 - 2006-08-29
denying his motion for resentencing after revocation of extended supervision. Copeland argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25908 - 2006-08-29
State v. Damon S. Clark
) and 939.05, Stats. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Clark claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11867 - 2005-03-31
) and 939.05, Stats. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Clark claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11867 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
offense. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70535 - 2014-09-15
offense. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70535 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
] The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously denied Lambert’s motion for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40224 - 2009-08-31
] The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously denied Lambert’s motion for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40224 - 2009-08-31
State v. Brandon K. Dittberner
sentence modification motion. Dittberner received a 165-day sentence with Huber privileges after he entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13219 - 2005-03-31
sentence modification motion. Dittberner received a 165-day sentence with Huber privileges after he entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13219 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his postconviction motion. Kobleske argues that his trial lawyer ineffectively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121446 - 2014-09-16
an order denying his postconviction motion. Kobleske argues that his trial lawyer ineffectively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121446 - 2014-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Subsequent to the filing of the no-merit report, Waldrop, pro se, filed a motion in the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257970 - 2020-04-14
. Subsequent to the filing of the no-merit report, Waldrop, pro se, filed a motion in the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257970 - 2020-04-14
CA Blank Order
(the Associations) appeal an order denying their motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145354 - 2015-07-30
(the Associations) appeal an order denying their motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145354 - 2015-07-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Charles Stechauner, pro se, appeals the circuit court’s order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307181 - 2020-11-24
Charles Stechauner, pro se, appeals the circuit court’s order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307181 - 2020-11-24