Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33211 - 33220 of 97797 for court records search online.
Search results 33211 - 33220 of 97797 for court records search online.
State v. Rochelle L. Oestreich
no criminal record and was less culpable than they were. She also argued that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12108 - 2005-03-31
no criminal record and was less culpable than they were. She also argued that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12108 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the records could ever be deemed ‘cumulative.’” The State also indicated “the circuit court did not explain
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94438 - 2014-09-15
of the records could ever be deemed ‘cumulative.’” The State also indicated “the circuit court did not explain
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94438 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Rochelle L. Oestreich
of the record, this court concludes that his analysis is correct. Sentencing is within the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12108 - 2017-09-21
of the record, this court concludes that his analysis is correct. Sentencing is within the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12108 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
SCR CHAPTER 61
or recording of a conference in a court facility between an attorney and client, co-counsel, or attorneys
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243103 - 2019-07-01
or recording of a conference in a court facility between an attorney and client, co-counsel, or attorneys
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243103 - 2019-07-01
[PDF]
Robert E. Williams v. Gwen A. Bradle-Williams
-half of the assets. We conclude that the record supports the trial court's exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8928 - 2017-09-19
-half of the assets. We conclude that the record supports the trial court's exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8928 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 16, 2010 A. John
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57881 - 2014-09-15
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 16, 2010 A. John
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57881 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
sentencing discretion, our review of the Record confirms that the court appropriately considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000743 - 2025-08-27
sentencing discretion, our review of the Record confirms that the court appropriately considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000743 - 2025-08-27
State v. James D.B.
therefore cannot claim on appeal that the record is inadequate to support the trial court’s award. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15914 - 2005-03-31
therefore cannot claim on appeal that the record is inadequate to support the trial court’s award. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15914 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
sentencing discretion, our review of the Record confirms that the court appropriately considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000743 - 2025-08-27
sentencing discretion, our review of the Record confirms that the court appropriately considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000743 - 2025-08-27
[PDF]
State v. James D.B.
the $25 annual fee. ¶4 The trial court’s order must be reversed because nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15914 - 2017-09-21
the $25 annual fee. ¶4 The trial court’s order must be reversed because nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15914 - 2017-09-21