Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33221 - 33230 of 39127 for c's.
Search results 33221 - 33230 of 39127 for c's.
State v. Keith S. Betts
. § 973.012 (1987-88), and (c) imposing an unduly harsh sentence. Thus, Betts concludes that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4538 - 2005-03-31
. § 973.012 (1987-88), and (c) imposing an unduly harsh sentence. Thus, Betts concludes that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4538 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rick R. Rome
on the brief of William C. Wolford, assistant attorney general, and James E. Doyle, attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2418 - 2005-03-31
on the brief of William C. Wolford, assistant attorney general, and James E. Doyle, attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2418 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2011-12). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121579 - 2014-09-17
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2011-12). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121579 - 2014-09-17
[PDF]
Rainald Schurmann v. Guy Neau
and Daniel C. Conway of Jacobson & Ratzel of Brookfield. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2233 - 2017-09-19
and Daniel C. Conway of Jacobson & Ratzel of Brookfield. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2233 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel Whaley
of discretion. C. DNA Evidence. Whaley also objects to the fact that DNA testing was allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10114 - 2017-09-19
of discretion. C. DNA Evidence. Whaley also objects to the fact that DNA testing was allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10114 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-RESPONDENT, V. JEFF SCOTT OLSON, JEFF SCOTT OLSON LAW FIRM, S. C. AND WISCONSIN LAWYERS MUTUAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117598 - 2017-09-21
-RESPONDENT, V. JEFF SCOTT OLSON, JEFF SCOTT OLSON LAW FIRM, S. C. AND WISCONSIN LAWYERS MUTUAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117598 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Robert Pasko v. City of Milwaukee
.2d 723 (1995) (citation omitted). “[C]laim preclusion is ‘designed to draw a line between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15960 - 2017-09-21
.2d 723 (1995) (citation omitted). “[C]laim preclusion is ‘designed to draw a line between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15960 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Robert P. Murphy v. MCC, Inc.
from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: DENNIS C. LUEBKE, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13993 - 2014-09-15
from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: DENNIS C. LUEBKE, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13993 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeffery L. Watson
County: WILLIAM M. ATKINSON and WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, Judges. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Myse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13804 - 2014-09-15
County: WILLIAM M. ATKINSON and WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, Judges. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Myse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13804 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Wedemeyer and Kessler, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32281 - 2014-09-15
for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Wedemeyer and Kessler, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32281 - 2014-09-15