Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33231 - 33240 of 98406 for court records search online.
Search results 33231 - 33240 of 98406 for court records search online.
CA Blank Order
District III March 12, 2013 To: Hon. Douglas T. Fox Circuit Court Judge Price County Courthouse
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93888 - 2013-03-11
District III March 12, 2013 To: Hon. Douglas T. Fox Circuit Court Judge Price County Courthouse
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93888 - 2013-03-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The plea colloquy record does not support these claims. During the colloquy, the circuit court reviewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277008 - 2020-08-12
. The plea colloquy record does not support these claims. During the colloquy, the circuit court reviewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277008 - 2020-08-12
CA Blank Order
. The record discloses no arguable basis for challenging the sentencing court’s discretion. The court could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139707 - 2011-04-19
. The record discloses no arguable basis for challenging the sentencing court’s discretion. The court could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139707 - 2011-04-19
[PDF]
WI APP 35
then review the circuit court’s mistrial decision here based on the record before it, and we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165673 - 2017-09-21
then review the circuit court’s mistrial decision here based on the record before it, and we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165673 - 2017-09-21
City of Milwaukee v. Benedict Reischel
, a transcript of which is not included in the appellate record, the court denied Reischel’s motion. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4166 - 2005-03-31
, a transcript of which is not included in the appellate record, the court denied Reischel’s motion. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4166 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Benedict Reischel
).” In an April 10, 2001 hearing, a transcript of which is not included in the appellate record, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4166 - 2017-09-20
).” In an April 10, 2001 hearing, a transcript of which is not included in the appellate record, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4166 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
sentence, if any. The court considered Bernsteen’s substantial prior record, which included prison
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138012 - 2015-03-23
sentence, if any. The court considered Bernsteen’s substantial prior record, which included prison
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138012 - 2015-03-23
CA Blank Order
District III July 30, 2013 To: Hon. David G. Miron Circuit Court Judge Marinette County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99852 - 2013-07-29
District III July 30, 2013 To: Hon. David G. Miron Circuit Court Judge Marinette County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99852 - 2013-07-29
State v. Rachel W. Kelty
of the double jeopardy issue would have required the court to go beyond the record. Here, Hubbard’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7045 - 2005-03-31
of the double jeopardy issue would have required the court to go beyond the record. Here, Hubbard’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7045 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rachel W. Kelty
that the record must show that she explicitly waived her multiplicity defense for the court to bar her double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7045 - 2017-09-20
that the record must show that she explicitly waived her multiplicity defense for the court to bar her double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7045 - 2017-09-20