Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33261 - 33270 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 33261 - 33270 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
of their claim. ¶7 In 2002, Katz asked for a tax reassessment on the building because, as he put it, “[v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68884 - 2011-08-23
of their claim. ¶7 In 2002, Katz asked for a tax reassessment on the building because, as he put it, “[v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68884 - 2011-08-23
COURT OF APPEALS
with Robert. She claims it was error to not use the shared placement formula in setting child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29404 - 2007-06-19
with Robert. She claims it was error to not use the shared placement formula in setting child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29404 - 2007-06-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was uninformed regarding the maximum sentence he could receive. He claims he thought he was facing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990100 - 2025-07-30
was uninformed regarding the maximum sentence he could receive. He claims he thought he was facing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990100 - 2025-07-30
2009 WI APP 145
, no breach occurred, and there was not a viable negligence claim.”) (discussing Hoida, Inc. v. M & I Midstate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40218 - 2009-10-27
, no breach occurred, and there was not a viable negligence claim.”) (discussing Hoida, Inc. v. M & I Midstate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40218 - 2009-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
conviction; and (3) denied his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. We reject his arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34977 - 2008-12-22
conviction; and (3) denied his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. We reject his arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34977 - 2008-12-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claims that Hart’s statements provided a basis for postconviction relief. Harris cannot relitigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160938 - 2017-09-21
claims that Hart’s statements provided a basis for postconviction relief. Harris cannot relitigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160938 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216149 - 2018-07-24
by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216149 - 2018-07-24
[PDF]
Frontsheet
on August 27, 2019, which he claims "cost my office $2,325.00" although he does not explain how
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297860 - 2020-12-10
on August 27, 2019, which he claims "cost my office $2,325.00" although he does not explain how
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297860 - 2020-12-10
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was uninformed regarding the maximum sentence he could receive. He claims he thought he was facing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990100 - 2025-07-30
was uninformed regarding the maximum sentence he could receive. He claims he thought he was facing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990100 - 2025-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
based on United’s July 2004 appraisal of the then-proposed condominium project. Mentell claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204745 - 2017-12-07
based on United’s July 2004 appraisal of the then-proposed condominium project. Mentell claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204745 - 2017-12-07

