Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33261 - 33270 of 50536 for our.
Search results 33261 - 33270 of 50536 for our.
State v. Steven D. Edidin
, 522 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App. 1994). Our goal when interpreting a statute is to determine and give effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3836 - 2013-07-15
, 522 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App. 1994). Our goal when interpreting a statute is to determine and give effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3836 - 2013-07-15
State v. Timothy J. Bartos
, 421 (1967). In Leach, our supreme court recognized: In determining whether or not the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15374 - 2005-03-31
, 421 (1967). In Leach, our supreme court recognized: In determining whether or not the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15374 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
regarding each issue presented, we limit our writing because of the varied rationales. ¶9 Accordingly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98994 - 2013-07-02
regarding each issue presented, we limit our writing because of the varied rationales. ¶9 Accordingly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98994 - 2013-07-02
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to modify placement or consider the motions simultaneously.[3] We will not abandon our neutrality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55470 - 2010-10-12
motion to modify placement or consider the motions simultaneously.[3] We will not abandon our neutrality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55470 - 2010-10-12
State v. Andrew M. Hansen
. v. Simonson, 120 Wis. 2d 458, 461, 355 N.W.2d 545 (Ct. App. 1984). Upon our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7348 - 2005-03-31
. v. Simonson, 120 Wis. 2d 458, 461, 355 N.W.2d 545 (Ct. App. 1984). Upon our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7348 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of a plea, many of the factors that they address in their briefs are relevant. Given our de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94600 - 2005-05-09
of a plea, many of the factors that they address in their briefs are relevant. Given our de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94600 - 2005-05-09
WI App 129 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2010AP1291 2010AP2022 20...
We organize our discussion of the issues presented in these appeals as follows. First, we provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103406 - 2015-06-03
We organize our discussion of the issues presented in these appeals as follows. First, we provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103406 - 2015-06-03
[PDF]
WI 73
judgment is rendered under Wis. Stat. § 804.12(2)(a). See our discussion, ¶¶41-42, infra, of Brandon
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33247 - 2014-09-15
judgment is rendered under Wis. Stat. § 804.12(2)(a). See our discussion, ¶¶41-42, infra, of Brandon
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33247 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
for a jury trial on the issue of damages. ¶46 Our decision in the present case is buttressed by federal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33247 - 2008-06-26
for a jury trial on the issue of damages. ¶46 Our decision in the present case is buttressed by federal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33247 - 2008-06-26
State v. John C. Setagord
. Stat. § 973.014(1)(b), our legislature included only a minimum, and not a maximum restriction
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16982 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 973.014(1)(b), our legislature included only a minimum, and not a maximum restriction
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16982 - 2005-03-31