Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33261 - 33270 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 33261 - 33270 of 58500 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Michael H. Woeshnick
No. 98-3469-CR 2 subject matter jurisdiction. He initiated this argument before the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14862 - 2017-09-21
No. 98-3469-CR 2 subject matter jurisdiction. He initiated this argument before the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14862 - 2017-09-21
State v. Randolph A. Clark
in Wisconsin after the trial court found unreasonable Clark’s refusal to submit to the chemical testing of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5197 - 2005-03-31
in Wisconsin after the trial court found unreasonable Clark’s refusal to submit to the chemical testing of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5197 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
parental responsibility. The no-merit report addresses whether the trial court properly rejected
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144354 - 2017-09-21
parental responsibility. The no-merit report addresses whether the trial court properly rejected
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144354 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claimed his pleas were not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because his trial attorney lied to him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105382 - 2017-09-21
claimed his pleas were not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because his trial attorney lied to him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105382 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Rick Freeman appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517981 - 2022-05-05
-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Rick Freeman appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517981 - 2022-05-05
State v. Daniel Haley
1989).[1] Haley contends that the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9796 - 2005-03-31
1989).[1] Haley contends that the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9796 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on appeal is whether the trial court properly exercised its sentencing discretion. We conclude that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37529 - 2009-07-13
on appeal is whether the trial court properly exercised its sentencing discretion. We conclude that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37529 - 2009-07-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 974.06 (2011-12). He alleged multiple ways in which he believed trial counsel had been ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189593 - 2017-09-21
. § 974.06 (2011-12). He alleged multiple ways in which he believed trial counsel had been ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189593 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at 1 The Hon. Randy Koschnick presided over the trial and entered the judgment of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252876 - 2020-01-30
at 1 The Hon. Randy Koschnick presided over the trial and entered the judgment of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252876 - 2020-01-30
State v. Jerod J. Bins
and scheduled for a jury trial. Between now and the next court date if some kind of plea agreement is worked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4050 - 2005-03-31
and scheduled for a jury trial. Between now and the next court date if some kind of plea agreement is worked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4050 - 2005-03-31