Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33281 - 33290 of 58483 for speedy trial.

v. Jane Peckham
parole officer, Courtney Spitz. The trial court granted summary judgment to Spitz for Peckham's failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11029 - 2005-03-31

City of Columbus v. Donald L. Johnson
a.m.[2] ¶7 The trial court concluded that the circumstances observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7225 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was convicted following a jury trial of theft of moveable property, obstruction, theft by misrepresentation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010504 - 2025-09-17

[PDF] NOTICE
for postconviction relief. We affirm. ¶2 Reel argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28353 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
by Adashun Jones, Inc.1 after a jury trial. We affirm the judgments. ¶2 McDonald owns a parcel adjoining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51717 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Annette Petrowsky v. Brad Krause
an injunction under § 813.12(4), STATS., should be granted against Krause. The trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12815 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a bench trial, the circuit court granted a money judgment in favor of Krueger against both defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357949 - 2021-04-20

[PDF] James R. Schilling v. State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
that the trial court considered materials outside the pleadings when it corresponded with the attorneys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6856 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 05, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
to suppress his statement. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied the motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27317 - 2006-12-04

State v. Janice D.
. has since died, should this court decide otherwise, Janice D.’s attorney contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6781 - 2005-03-31