Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33291 - 33300 of 57167 for id.
Search results 33291 - 33300 of 57167 for id.
Village of Thiensville v. Jon R. Olsen
court. See id. Olsen’s theory is that reconsideration assumes a question which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14276 - 2005-03-31
court. See id. Olsen’s theory is that reconsideration assumes a question which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14276 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ricky A. Bright
was not necessary to preserve the issue for purposes of review. See id. ¶15 That is markedly different from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15963 - 2005-03-31
was not necessary to preserve the issue for purposes of review. See id. ¶15 That is markedly different from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15963 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the absence of duress or coercion, either express or implied. Id. This determination is made after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135021 - 2017-09-21
in the absence of duress or coercion, either express or implied. Id. This determination is made after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135021 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
special definitions. Id. If the statute is unambiguous, we apply the plain meaning of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30501 - 2014-09-15
special definitions. Id. If the statute is unambiguous, we apply the plain meaning of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30501 - 2014-09-15
State v. Christopher Walker
). The first prong of Strickland requires that the defendant show that counsel's performance was deficient. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8817 - 2005-03-31
). The first prong of Strickland requires that the defendant show that counsel's performance was deficient. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8817 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of an intoxicant.” Id. ¶15 Similarly, if the trial court found Rohde caused injury by the intoxicated use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118087 - 2014-09-15
of an intoxicant.” Id. ¶15 Similarly, if the trial court found Rohde caused injury by the intoxicated use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118087 - 2014-09-15
State v. Joe J. Davis
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. at 310 (citations omitted). A circuit court may refuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16308 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. at 310 (citations omitted). A circuit court may refuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16308 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
,’ [are] not ... clear and unequivocal request[s] for counsel.” Id. (quoting Davis, 512 U.S. at 462). “‘Unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138234 - 2015-03-23
,’ [are] not ... clear and unequivocal request[s] for counsel.” Id. (quoting Davis, 512 U.S. at 462). “‘Unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138234 - 2015-03-23
State v. William E. Conley
as of the time of counsel’s conduct. See id. We will “strongly presume” counsel to have rendered adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12922 - 2005-03-31
as of the time of counsel’s conduct. See id. We will “strongly presume” counsel to have rendered adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12922 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 91
sources to aid our construction. Id., ¶46. The two contested subsections of § 973.09 are as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36492 - 2014-09-15
sources to aid our construction. Id., ¶46. The two contested subsections of § 973.09 are as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36492 - 2014-09-15